Cx ProgrammerApplication · Omron

CVE-2023-22277

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.79 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Use after free vulnerability exists in CX-Programmer Ver.9.79 and earlier. By having a user open a specially crafted CXP file, information disclosure and/or arbitrary code execution may occur. This vulnerability is different from CVE-2023-22317 and CVE-2023-22314.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Use-after-free vulnerability in CX-Programmer versions 9.79 and earlier allows remote attackers to achieve information disclosure and/or arbitrary code execution via specially crafted CXP files opened by users.

MitigationUpdate CX-Programmer to version 9.80 or later; do not open untrusted CXP files until the patch is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cx ProgrammerApplication
Affected:<= 9.79

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CX-Programmer installation
    Locate CX-Programmer on the system via the Windows Start menu, Program Files directory, or by searching for the executable (usually named CX-Programmer.exe or similar). Right-click the application and select 'Properties' to view the version information on the 'Details' tab.
    Affected if The displayed version number is 9.79 or lower.
  2. Compare version to affected range
    Check the 'File Version' or 'Product Version' field shown in the application properties. CX-Programmer follows a sequential version numbering scheme.
    Affected if The installed version is 9.79 or any version number lower than 9.79.
  3. Determine exposure to CXP file handling
    Review whether the system has been used to open .cxp files, which are project files for CX-Programmer. Check recent file access in the Windows Jump List, Recent Documents, or the application's recent files list if available.
    Affected if The system has opened .cxp files from untrusted or external sources, or users routinely open .cxp files without verification.

A system is affected if CX-Programmer version 9.79 or earlier is installed AND the software is used to open .cxp project files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.79
Interim mitigation

Update CX-Programmer to version 9.80 or later; do not open untrusted CXP files until the patch is applied.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

CX-Programmer version > 9.79 (latest available version from Omron)

  1. 1. Navigate to the official Omron website or authorized distributor for CX-Programmer software
  2. 2. Locate the downloads or support section for CX-Programmer
  3. 3. Check for the latest available version of CX-Programmer that is higher than version 9.79
  4. 4. Download the latest version installer
  5. 5. Backup any existing projects and files before upgrading
  6. 6. Run the installer and follow the on-screen prompts to complete the upgrade
  7. 7. After installation, verify the new version number in the software help/about section
Caveat Review release notes for any changes to project file compatibility or deprecated features before upgrading production systems

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Cx Programmer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22277 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22277 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data