CVE-2023-22278
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedm-FILTER prior to Ver.5.70R01 (Ver.5 Series) and m-FILTER prior to Ver.4.87R04 (Ver.4 Series) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication and send users' unintended email when email is being sent under the certain conditions. The attacks exploiting this vulnerability have been observed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencem-FILTER mail filtering software contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in versions prior to Ver.5.70R01 (Ver.5 Series) and Ver.4.87R04 (Ver.4 Series). A remote unauthenticated attacker can bypass authentication mechanisms under certain conditions and send emails appearing to originate from legitimate users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0, < 4.87r04>= 5.0, < 5.70r01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed m-FILTER versionLocate the m-FILTER version information in the product interface, configuration files, or by running the product's version command. Typical locations include the admin console, about page, or version diagnostic command.Affected if The version displayed is below 4.87r04 for Ver.4 series or below 5.70r01 for Ver.5 series
-
Determine the version seriesConfirm whether the installed product is the Ver.4 Series or Ver.5 Series based on the version number format. Ver.4 series versions start with 4.x, Ver.5 series versions start with 5.x.Affected if The version begins with 4.x or 5.x indicating it falls into one of the affected version ranges
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls within: >= 4.0 and < 4.87r04 for Ver.4 Series, or >= 5.0 and < 5.70r01 for Ver.5 Series.Affected if The installed version is within either of these two ranges (inclusive of the lower bound, exclusive of the upper bound)
-
Verify authentication bypass conditionsExamine m-FILTER authentication configuration settings to determine if the conditions that allow unauthenticated email submission are present. Review settings related to SMTP authentication, relay permissions, and external access controls.Affected if The authentication configuration allows external or unauthenticated connections that could permit email submission from arbitrary senders
A system is affected if it runs m-FILTER version 4.0 to 4.87r03 (Ver.4 series) or version 5.0 to 5.70r00 (Ver.5 series) AND the authentication bypass conditions are present in the configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.87r045.70r01
Upgrade m-FILTER to Ver.5.70R01 or later (Ver.5 Series) or Ver.4.87R04 or later (Ver.4 Series) to remediate this vulnerability.
Ver.5 Series: upgrade to Ver.5.70R01 or later; Ver.4 Series: upgrade to Ver.4.87R04 or later
- Identify the current version of m-FILTER being used (Ver.4.x or Ver.5.x)
- If running Ver.5.x (>=5.0): upgrade to Ver.5.70R01 or later
- If running Ver.4.x (>=4.0, <4.87): upgrade to Ver.4.87R04 or later; consider migrating to Ver.5.70R01 for extended support
- After upgrading, verify that authentication is properly enforced for email sending
- Confirm that the authentication bypass vulnerability is no longer present
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22278 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data