CVE-2023-22323
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn BIP-IP versions 17.0.x before 17.0.0.2, 16.1.x before 16.1.3.3, 15.1.x before 15.1.8.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.3, and all versions of 13.1.x, when OCSP authentication profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in CPU resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP where specific requests to virtual servers with OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol) authentication profiles configured can trigger excessive CPU consumption. The vulnerability is network-exploitable, requires no authentication, and allows attackers to potentially render services unavailable through resource exhaustion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine BIG-IP versionRun command: tmsh show /sys version or check the BIG-IP login splash page for the version numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 13.1.0-13.1.5, 14.1.0-14.1.5.2, 15.1.0-15.1.8.0, 16.1.0-16.1.3.2, or 17.0.0-17.0.0.1
-
Identify virtual servers with client SSL profilesRun command: tmsh list /ltm virtual where profiles contains clientsslAffected if Any virtual servers exist that reference client SSL profiles
-
Check client SSL profiles for OCSP configurationRun command: tmsh list /ltm profile client-ssl all-properties | grep -i ocspAffected if Any client SSL profile has an OCSP responder configured (ocsp-responder name is set)
-
Verify OCSP authentication profiles are attached to virtual serversFor each virtual server identified, run: tmsh list /ltm virtual <virtual_name> and inspect the profiles section for OCSP-related client SSL profilesAffected if Any virtual server has a client SSL profile with OCSP enabled attached to it
If the BIG-IP version is within the affected ranges AND a virtual server has an OCSP authentication profile configured, the environment is vulnerable to this DoS flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.1.5.315.1.8.116.1.3.3
Upgrade BIG-IP to version 17.0.0.2, 16.1.3.3, 15.1.8.1, or 14.1.5.3 respectively. For 13.1.x (EoTS), upgrade to a supported version. Alternatively, if OCSP authentication is not required, remove the OCSP authentication profile from affected virtual servers.
Upgrade to 14.1.5.3 (for 14.1.x), 15.1.8.1 (for 15.1.x), 16.1.3.3 (for 16.1.x), or 17.0.0.2 (for 17.0.x). Note: 13.1.x is End of Technical Support and no patch is available; migrate to a supported version.
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the web UI.
- 2. Determine which BIG-IP module(s) are affected: Access Policy Manager (APM), Application Security Manager (ASM), or others with OCSP authentication profiles configured.
- 3. Identify virtual servers configured with OCSP authentication profiles: go to Local Traffic > Virtual Servers > click each virtual server > Access Policy > Authentication > verify OCSP is configured.
- 4. Back up the current BIG-IP configuration using 'tmsh save sys config' or via the web UI (System > Archives > Create).
- 5. Plan maintenance window as upgrade requires brief service interruption.
- 6. Download the appropriate hotfix from F5Networks support portal based on your current major version (14.1.5.3, 15.1.8.1, 16.1.3.3, or 17.0.0.2).
- 7. Upload and install the hotfix via 'tmsh install sys software hotfix' or through the web UI (Software Management > Hotfix > Upload).
- 8. Reboot the BIG-IP device to apply changes.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22323 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22323 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data