CVE-2023-22351
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds write in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in UEFI firmware affecting certain Intel processors. The flaw allows a privileged local user to potentially escalate privileges by writing beyond allocated memory boundaries in the firmware, which runs at the highest privilege level (below the OS).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Intel processor modelRun 'wmic cpu get name,processorid' on Windows or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Linux to identify the exact Intel CPU modelAffected if Processor is one of the affected Intel CPU families listed in Intel's advisory for this CVE
-
Check UEFI/BIOS firmware versionOn Windows, run 'wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion' or check in System Information. On Linux, run 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or check /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_versionAffected if Installed UEFI/BIOS version falls within the vulnerable version range for your specific Intel processor as documented by Intel
-
Verify UEFI boot mode is activeOn Windows, run 'msinfo32' and check 'BIOS Mode'. On Linux, run 'test -d /sys/firmware/efi && echo UEFI || echo Legacy'Affected if System boots in UEFI mode (required for this vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Confirm local privileged access existsCheck for users with administrator/root privileges on the system using 'whoami /priv' on Windows or 'id' on LinuxAffected if Attacker already has privileged local access, which is required to exploit this vulnerability
You are affected if your Intel processor model is in the affected list and your installed UEFI/BIOS version is within the vulnerable version range published by Intel for that processor.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Intel-provided UEFI/BIOS firmware updates to affected processors. This requires coordinated deployment across affected systems, typically during scheduled maintenance windows, as firmware updates carry risk of rendering systems unbootable if interrupted.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22351 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22351 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data