CVE-2023-22393
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in BGP route processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an attacker to cause Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) crash by sending a BGP route with invalid next-hop resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue only affects systems without import policy configured. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2-S2, 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S1, 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R2-S2-EVO, 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R1-S1-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 21.1R1. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions prior to 21.3R1-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows remote attackers to crash the Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) by sending specially crafted BGP routes with invalid next-hop addresses. The issue stems from improper handling of exceptional conditions during BGP route processing, causing a daemon crash and resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'request system software version' command to retrieve the exact Junos OS version running on the deviceAffected if The version matches 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, or 22.2 for Junos OS or 21.4, 22.1, 22.2 for Junos OS Evolved
-
Verify BGP is configured and activeRun 'show bgp summary' or 'show configuration protocols bgp' to check if BGP protocol is enabled and peers existAffected if BGP is enabled and actively exchanging routes with peers
-
Check BGP peer exposureRun 'show bgp neighbor' to review which BGP peers are configured and their originAffected if The device accepts BGP connections from untrusted or external peers who could send malicious routes
-
Inspect BGP import policy configurationRun 'show configuration protocols bgp group' and look for 'import' policy statements under BGP configurationAffected if No import policy is configured to validate or filter next-hop addresses in received BGP routes
You are affected if your Junos version is one of the listed versions, BGP is actively running, and you accept BGP routes from peers without filtering invalid next-hop addresses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply a BGP import policy to filter routes with invalid next-hops, or upgrade to the patched versions specified in the advisory.
Upgrade to the fixed release for your current branch (e.g., 21.4R3, 22.1R2, or 22.2R2)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Based on your current version, upgrade to one of the fixed releases: For 21.1.x upgrade to 21.1R3-S4 or later; For 21.2.x upgrade to 21.2R3-S3 or later; For 21.3.x upgrade to 21.3R3-S2 or later; For 21.4.x upgrade to 21.4R2-S2, 21.4R3, or later; For 22.1.x upgrade to 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2, or later; For 22.2.x upgrade to 22.2R1-S1, 22.2R2, or later
- 3. Download the appropriate upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 4. Upload the Junos upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or USB
- 5. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name>' and reboot the device
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version with 'show version' and confirm BGP is operational with 'show bgp summary'
- 7. As an additional safeguard (though upgrading is strongly preferred), you may also configure a BGP import policy to filter routes with invalid next-hops using 'set protocols bgp group <name> import <policy-name>' with appropriate next-hop validation terms
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22393 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22393 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data