CVE-2023-22399
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen sFlow is enabled and it monitors a packet forwarded via ECMP, a buffer management vulnerability in the dcpfe process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10K Series systems allows an attacker to cause the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) to crash and restart by sending specific genuine packets to the device, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. The dcpfe process tries to copy more data into a smaller buffer, which overflows and corrupts the buffer, causing a crash of the dcpfe process. Continued receipt and processing of these packets will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10K Series: All versions prior to 19.4R3-S9; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S6; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2-S2, 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S2, 22.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the dcpfe process on Juniper QFX10K Series switches where sFlow monitoring of ECMP-forwarded packets causes the PFE to crash due to a buffer copy operation exceeding buffer boundaries, resulting in repeatable DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 19.4= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' and locate the hardware model in the outputAffected if Device is not a QFX10K Series switch (the vulnerability only affects QFX10K Series)
-
Verify Junos versionRun 'show version' and locate the Junos OS version stringAffected if Version matches 19.4, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, or 22.2 (compare your installed version to these affected ranges)
-
Confirm sFlow monitoring is enabledRun 'show protocols sflow' and check the output for sFlow configuration statusAffected if sFlow is enabled and collecting samples (sFlow must be active for the buffer overflow to trigger)
-
Check for ECMP routing configurationRun 'show routing-options forwarding-table' or 'show configuration routing-options' and look for ecmp-related settingsAffected if ECMP (Equal-Cost Multipath) is configured and active (ECMP-forwarded packets are required to trigger the flaw)
-
Inspect for dcpfe crash eventsRun 'show log messages' and search for recent dcpfe process crashes or PFE restart entriesAffected if Recent dcpfe crashes or PFE restarts are logged, indicating potential exploitation
User is affected if they run a vulnerable Junos version (19.4, 20.2-20.4, 21.1-21.4, or 22.1-22.2) on QFX10K hardware with both sFlow monitoring and ECMP forwarding enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Juniper-supplied Junos OS patches for affected versions; consider disabling sFlow if not required, or implement network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted traffic sources.
Upgrade to the minimum fixed version for your current branch: 19.4R3-S9, 20.2R3-S6, 20.3R3-S6, 20.4R3-S5, 21.1R3-S4, 21.2R3-S3, 21.3R3-S2, 21.4R3, 22.1R2, or 22.2R2 respectively. For example, if on 20.4 branch, upgrade to 20.4R3-S5 or later.
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the QFX10K Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Identify which branch (19.4, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, or 22.2) the current version belongs to
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version for that branch from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device
- 5. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name>' command
- 6. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot' command to apply the new software
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm sFlow functionality is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22399 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22399 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data