Openshift Api For Data ProtectionApplication · Redhat

CVE-2023-2253

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-06-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in the `/v2/_catalog` endpoint in distribution/distribution, which accepts a parameter to control the maximum number of records returned (query string: `n`). This vulnerability allows a malicious user to submit an unreasonably large value for `n,` causing the allocation of a massive string array, possibly causing a denial of service through excessive use of memory.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The `/v2/_catalog` endpoint in distribution/distribution accepts a query parameter `n` to limit records returned. An attacker can submit an excessively large value for `n`, causing the server to allocate a massive string array, leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service.

MitigationImplement server-side validation to limit the `n` parameter to a reasonable maximum value (e.g., 1000), and add request size/length constraints to prevent abuse.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openshift Api For Data ProtectionApplication
Affected:all versions
Openshift Container PlatformApplication
Affected:= 4.0
Openshift Developer Tools And ServicesApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if OpenShift is deployed
    Check if your environment runs Red Hat Openshift Container Platform version 4.0, Openshift Api For Data Protection, or Openshift Developer Tools And Services. Look at your OpenShift installation or container inventory.
    Affected if Any of these Red Hat products are deployed and the Docker Registry v2 API is accessible
  2. Confirm Docker Registry v2 API exposure
    Attempt to access the /v2/_catalog endpoint on your container registry service. This is typically at your registry URL followed by /v2/_catalog (e.g., https://registry.example.com/v2/_catalog).
    Affected if The endpoint responds with a JSON catalog response, indicating the API is exposed
  3. Verify parameter handling behavior
    Send a request to /v2/_catalog with an excessively large n parameter value (such as n=999999999) and observe server response time and memory behavior. Compare response to a normal request with n=10.
    Affected if The server takes significantly longer to respond or shows signs of high memory usage with the large n value, indicating lack of proper parameter validation

You are affected if you run any of the listed Red Hat OpenShift products and have the Docker Registry v2 API exposed without server-side validation limiting the n parameter on the /v2/_catalog endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement server-side validation to limit the `n` parameter to a reasonable maximum value (e.g., 1000), and add request size/length constraints to prevent abuse.

Fix this in Openshift Api For Data Protection Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2253 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data