CVE-2023-22749
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere are multiple command injection vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba Networks access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple command injection vulnerabilities exist in the PAPI (Aruba Networks access point management protocol) handling code. By sending specially crafted UDP packets to port 8211, unauthenticated attackers can inject arbitrary OS commands that execute with elevated (privileged) privileges on affected Aruba access point devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.0, <= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.8>= 8.6.0.0, <= 8.6.0.19>= 8.10.0.0, <= 8.10.0.4>= 10.3.0.0, <= 10.3.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Aruba device typeDetermine if the device is an Aruba SD-WAN appliance or an ArubaOS access point. Use 'show version' or check the device model via the management interface.Affected if The device is an Aruba SD-WAN or ArubaOS access point.
-
Check the installed software versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI or check the firmware version via the web management interface. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: SD-WAN 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.0 through 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.8; ArubaOS 8.6.0.0 through 8.6.0.19, 8.10.0.0 through 8.10.0.4, or 10.3.0.0 through 10.3.1.0.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected version ranges.
-
Verify UDP port 8211 accessibilityFrom an external network perspective, test if UDP port 8211 is reachable on the device. Use 'nc -uv <device_ip> 8211' or 'nmap -sU -p 8211 <device_ip>' from an untrusted network segment.Affected if UDP port 8211 is exposed and reachable from untrusted networks.
-
Confirm PAPI service statusCheck if the PAPI (Aruba AP management protocol) service is enabled and listening on the device. Run 'show ip interface' or check the service listening on UDP port 8211.Affected if PAPI service is running and listening on UDP port 8211.
The environment is affected if the device is an Aruba SD-WAN or ArubaOS AP running an affected version with UDP port 8211 exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided patches immediately; if patching is not immediately feasible, restrict network access to UDP port 8211 via firewall or ACLs to prevent unauthenticated attackers from reaching the PAPI service.
ArubaOS 8.6.0.20+ / 8.10.0.5+ / 10.3.1.1+; SD-WAN 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9+
- Identify the currently installed ArubaOS or SD-WAN version using 'show version' or the WebUI
- For ArubaOS 8.6.x: Upgrade to version 8.6.0.20 or later
- For ArubaOS 8.10.x: Upgrade to version 8.10.0.5 or later
- For ArubaOS 10.3.x: Upgrade to version 10.3.1.1 or later
- For SD-WAN (8.7.0.0-2.3.x): Upgrade to version 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9 or later
- After upgrade, verify the version with 'show version' and confirm the PAPI service is running on UDP port 8211
- Review access controls and consider firewall rules to restrict UDP port 8211 to trusted management interfaces only
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22749 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22749 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data