CVE-2023-22842
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP versions 16.1.x before 16.1.3.3, 15.1.x before 15.1.8.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.3, and all versions of 13.1.x, when a SIP profile is configured on a Message Routing type virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in BIG-IP TMM where specially crafted traffic directed at a Message Routing virtual server with an active SIP profile causes the Traffic Management Microkernel to terminate, resulting in service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.8.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or inspect /etc/product_version to obtain the installed BIG-IP versionAffected if The version falls within these ranges: 13.1.0-13.1.5, 14.1.0-14.1.5.2, 15.1.0-15.1.8.0, or 16.1.0-16.1.3.2
-
Identify Message Routing virtual serversRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual' and look for virtual servers with 'profile' entries containing 'sip' or 'message-routing'Affected if Any virtual server is configured with a Message Routing profile type
-
Verify SIP profile is attachedFor each Message Routing virtual server, run 'tmsh list ltm virtual <name>' and examine the 'profile' section for a sip profileAffected if A SIP profile is listed in the virtual server's profile configuration
-
Confirm TMM restart eventsCheck /var/log/ltm for TMM crash events or run 'tmsh show sys tmm-stat' for abnormal restart countsAffected if Multiple TMM restarts have occurred without corresponding maintenance windows
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is in the vulnerable range AND you have a Message Routing virtual server with an active SIP profile configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.1.5.315.1.8.116.1.3.3
Upgrade BIG-IP to version 16.1.3.3 or later (15.1.x to 15.1.8.1+, 14.1.x to 14.1.5.3+). For 13.1.x (EoTS), remove or disable SIP profiles from Message Routing virtual servers as no patch is available.
14.1.5.3 or later; 15.1.8.1 or later; 16.1.3.3 or later (13.1.x is EoTS with no fix)
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP version by checking System > Software Management > ISO Image or using 'tmsh show sys version'
- 2. Determine if a SIP profile is configured on any Message Routing type virtual servers (Go to Local Traffic > Virtual Servers > Virtual Server List and review profiles)
- 3. If SIP profiles are in use on Message Routing virtual servers, plan for immediate upgrade due to the severity of TMM termination
- 4. For BIG-IP 14.1.x: Upgrade to version 14.1.5.3 or later
- 5. For BIG-IP 15.1.x: Upgrade to version 15.1.8.1 or later
- 6. For BIG-IP 16.1.x: Upgrade to version 16.1.3.3 or later
- 7. For BIG-IP 13.1.x: This version is End of Technical Support (EoTS) with no patch available; migrate to a supported version (14.1.5.3+, 15.1.8.1+, or 16.1.3.3+)
- 8. After upgrade, verify virtual servers are operational and TMM is stable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-22842 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-22842 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data