CVE-2023-2319
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIt was discovered that an update for PCS package in RHBA-2023:2151 erratum released as part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 failed to include the fix for the Webpack issue CVE-2023-28154 (for PCS package), which was previously addressed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.1 via erratum RHSA-2023:1591. The CVE-2023-2319 was assigned to that Red Hat specific security regression in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Red Hat-specific security regression in RHEL 9.2. The PCS package update (RHBA-2023:2151) failed to include the previously available fix for CVE-2023-28154 (a Webpack vulnerability), creating a regression where the critical vulnerability reintroduced itself in the 9.2 release despite having been fixed in RHEL 9.1 via RHSA-2023:1591.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 9.2= 0.11.4-6.el9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify PCS package is installedRun: rpm -qa | grep -i pcsAffected if The pcs package is not installed, then this CVE does not apply. If installed, continue to next step.
-
Check installed PCS versionRun: rpm -q --queryformat '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}' pcsAffected if Version matches 0.11.4-6.el9 or falls within the affected RHEL 9.0/9.2 High Availability ranges, indicating the regression is present.
-
Confirm Webpack vulnerability statusRun: rpm -q --changelog pcs | grep -i 'CVE-2023-28154\|webpack'Affected if No output returned means the CVE-2023-28154 fix is NOT present (the regression applies). If the changelog shows the fix for CVE-2023-28154, the system is protected.
-
Alternative: Check for vulnerable Webpack filesLocate webpack JavaScript files under /usr/lib/pcs/drf/ or /usr/share/pcs/drf/ and check their content for known vulnerable patterns (的具体内容需参照CVE-2023-28154)Affected if Vulnerable webpack files exist without the security fix applied.
If PCS version 0.11.4-6.el9 is installed on RHEL 9.2 and the changelog does not show CVE-2023-28154 as fixed, the system is affected by this regression.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the corrected PCS package update for RHEL 9.2 that includes the fix for CVE-2023-28154. Organizations should ensure they are on the latest errata that properly include the Webpack vulnerability fix.
Latest available PCS package via Red Hat update channels (later than 0.11.4-6.el9, incorporating the CVE-2023-28154 fix)
- Run 'dnf check-update' or 'yum update' to check for available PCS updates
- Update the PCS package using 'sudo dnf update pcs' or 'sudo yum update pcs'
- After updating, verify the new version with 'rpm -q pcs' to confirm the fix is applied
- Restart any PCS services if necessary to load the updated package
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2319 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data