SurelockApplication · 42gears

CVE-2023-2335

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-04-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.40.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Plaintext Password in Registry vulnerability in 42gears surelock windows surelockwinsetupv2.40.0.Exe on Windows (Registery modules) allows Retrieve Admin user credentials This issue affects surelock windows: from 2.3.12 through 2.40.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The 42gears SureLock Windows application stores admin user credentials in plaintext within the Windows Registry. This allows any local user or malware with registry access to retrieve admin passwords without authentication. The vulnerability stems from insecure storage of sensitive credentials in a location accessible to standard users.

MitigationUpgrade to a version beyond 2.40.0 that addresses this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict registry permissions to prevent unauthorized access and monitor for suspicious registry read operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SurelockApplication
Affected:>= 2.3.12, <= 2.40.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm SureLock installation and version
    Open Windows Settings > Apps > Apps & Features and locate 42gears SureLock, or run PowerShell: Get-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\*' | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like '*SureLock*'} | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion
    Affected if SureLock is installed and version falls between 2.3.12 and 2.40.0 inclusive
  2. Identify registry location storing credentials
    Locate the Windows Registry keys used by SureLock for storing admin credentials. Typical paths may be under HKLM\SOFTWARE\42gears or HKCU\SOFTWARE\42gears. Use Regedit to navigate to these locations or run: Get-ChildItem -Path 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE','HKCU:\SOFTWARE' -Recurse -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Where-Object {$_.Name -like '*42gears*' -or $_.Name -like '*SureLock*'}
    Affected if Registry keys containing admin usernames and passwords exist and contain plaintext credential data
  3. Verify registry key permissions allow standard user access
    Right-click the identified credential registry key in Regedit, select Permissions, and check the permissions for the Users group. Alternatively, run: Get-Acl 'REGISTRY::HKLM\SOFTWARE\42gears\SureLock' | Select-Object -ExpandProperty Access | Where-Object {$_.IdentityReference -like '*Users*' -and $_.FileSystemRights -like '*Read*'}
    Affected if Standard users or the Users group have Read access to the registry keys storing credentials, allowing any local user to retrieve the plaintext passwords

Your environment is affected if SureLock version is between 2.3.12 and 2.40.0 and the registry keys storing admin credentials are readable by standard users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.40.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a version beyond 2.40.0 that addresses this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict registry permissions to prevent unauthorized access and monitor for suspicious registry read operations.

Fix this in Surelock Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2335 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data