CVE-2023-23623
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedElectron is a framework which lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. A Content-Security-Policy that disables eval, specifically setting a `script-src` directive and _not_ providing `unsafe-eval` in that directive, is not respected in renderers that have sandbox disabled. i.e. `sandbox: false` in the `webPreferences` object. This allows usage of methods like `eval()` and `new Function` unexpectedly which can result in an expanded attack surface. This issue only ever affected the 22 and 23 major versions of Electron and has been fixed in the latest versions of those release lines. Specifically, these versions contain the fixes: 22.0.1 and 23.0.0-alpha.2 We recommend all apps upgrade to the latest stable version of Electron. If upgrading isn't possible, this issue can be addressed without upgrading by enabling `sandbox: true` on all renderers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceElectron versions 22.x and 23.x fail to enforce Content-Security-Policy script-src restrictions when sandbox is disabled in webPreferences, allowing eval() and new Function to execute even when 'unsafe-eval' is not included in the CSP directive.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 22.0.0= 23.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Electron versionCheck the package.json dependency version (electron: "^22.x" or "^23.x"), or run `console.log(process.versions.electron)` in the renderer console, or run `electron --version` from the installed binaryAffected if The version is 22.0.0 through 22.x.x (before 22.0.1) OR 23.0.0 through 23.x.x (before 23.0.0-alpha.2)
-
Locate webPreferences configurations in the codebaseSearch source code for BrowserWindow or webContents creation where webPreferences are defined, or inspect at runtime via DevTools: `const w = require("electron").remote.getCurrentWindow(); console.log(w.webContents.getWebPreferences())`Affected if Any renderer has sandbox: false explicitly set, or sandbox is omitted (defaults to false in affected versions)
-
Check if Content-Security-Policy is in useReview HTTP response headers for "Content-Security-Policy", or check HTML meta tags (<meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="...">)Affected if A CSP header or meta tag exists with a script-src directive that does NOT include 'unsafe-eval'
-
Verify eval/new Function execution is possibleOpen DevTools on the renderer, then run `eval("console.log(1)")` or `new Function("console.log(1)")()`. If either executes without a CSP violation error, the flaw is presentAffected if eval() or new Function executes successfully despite script-src not containing 'unsafe-eval'
You are affected if running Electron 22.x or 23.x with sandbox disabled in webPreferences AND CSP script-src is configured without 'unsafe-eval', allowing code execution via eval/new Function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedEither upgrade to Electron 22.0.1+/23.0.0-alpha.2+ OR enable sandbox: true in all renderer webPreferences configurations.
Electron 22.0.1 or later stable (22.x line), or latest stable 23.x release
- Identify the current Electron version used in your application by checking package.json or the electron version in your dependencies
- Update Electron to version 22.0.1 or later (for the 22.x release line), or to the latest stable 23.x release
- Run npm install or yarn to update the Electron dependency
- Rebuild and repackage your application with the updated Electron version
- Test that the application functions correctly with the new Electron version
- If upgrading is not possible, add 'sandbox: true' to all webPreferences objects in BrowserWindow or webContents creation to mitigate the issue
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-23623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-23623 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data