CVE-2023-23925
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSwitcher Client is a JavaScript SDK to work with Switcher API which is cloud-based Feature Flag. Unsanitized input flows into Strategy match operation (EXIST), where it is used to build a regular expression. This may result in a Regular expression Denial of Service attack (reDOS). This issue has been patched in version 3.1.4. As a workaround, avoid using Strategy settings that use REGEX in conjunction with EXIST and NOT_EXIST operations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Switcher Client JavaScript SDK (versions before 3.1.4) has a reDOS vulnerability where unsanitized user input flows into the Strategy match operation labeled EXIST. This input is directly used to construct a regular expression without proper sanitization, allowing an attacker to provide specially crafted input that causes catastrophic backtracking and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed version of Switcher Client JavaScript SDKLocate the package.json file for the Switcher Client SDK in your node_modules or project dependencies. Look for the 'version' field under 'switcher-client' or similar package name.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 3.1.4 (e.g., 3.1.3, 3.1.0, 2.x.x)
-
Identify usage of Strategy match operationsSearch your codebase for imports and usage of the Strategy class from the Switcher Client SDK. Look for code that instantiates Strategy objects with operation types.Affected if Your code creates Strategy objects with the 'EXIST' or 'NOT_EXIST' operation labels
-
Check for REGEX type combined with EXIST/NOT_EXIST operationsReview the Strategy object configurations in your code. Look for instances where the Strategy is configured with 'type' set to 'REGEX' while using 'EXIST' or 'NOT_EXIST' as the operation.Affected if A Strategy object has type REGEX and operation EXIST or NOT_EXIST simultaneously
-
Trace user input into Strategy match operationsAudit the code paths where user-provided input (request parameters, body data, query strings) is passed as input to the Strategy.match() method or equivalent function.Affected if Unsanitized user-controlled strings are passed directly to the match operation without validation or escaping
You are affected if your installed Switcher Client SDK version is below 3.1.4 AND your code uses Strategy with REGEX type combined with EXIST/NOT_EXIST operations where user input flows into the match without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.1.4
Upgrade to version 3.1.4 or later which contains the patch. As a temporary workaround, avoid using Strategy settings that combine REGEX type with EXIST or NOT_EXIST operations.
3.1.4
- Check current installed version by reviewing package.json or running `npm list switcher-client`
- Upgrade to version 3.1.4 using your package manager: `npm install [email protected]` or `yarn add [email protected]`
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version with `npm list switcher-client`
- If using REGEX in Strategy settings with EXIST or NOT_EXIST operations, test that the fix properly sanitizes input before deploying to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-23925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-23925 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data