CVE-2023-2444
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross site request forgery vulnerability exists in Rockwell Automation's FactoryTalk Vantagepoint. This vulnerability can be exploited in two ways. If an attacker sends a malicious link to a computer that is on the same domain as the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint server and a user clicks the link, the attacker could impersonate the legitimate user and send requests to the affected product. Additionally, if an attacker sends an untrusted link to a computer that is not on the same domain as the server and a user opens the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint website, enters credentials for the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint server, and clicks on the malicious link a cross site request forgery attack would be successful as well.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rockwell Automation's FactoryTalk Vantagepoint that allows authenticated users to be tricked into unknowingly sending malicious requests to the application. The attacker exploits the trust the server places in authenticated browser sessions by crafting malicious links that, when clicked by a logged-in user, cause the browser to perform unintended actions on behalf of the attacker.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.40CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FactoryTalk Vantagepoint installationLocate the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint installation directory or check Windows Programs and Features for Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Vantagepoint entryAffected if The product is not installed on the system - no further action needed, otherwise continue checking
-
Determine installed versionOpen the application's About section from the Help menu, check the installation folder for version information files, or use Windows Programs and Features to view the installed versionAffected if Version number is lower than 8.40 (e.g., 8.30, 8.20, etc.) - the application is affected by the vulnerability
-
Inspect anti-CSRF protectionExamine state-changing requests (such as form submissions or API calls) in the application using a web proxy or browser developer tools. Check if each state-changing request includes a CSRF token or unique security parameter that the server validatesAffected if State-changing requests do not include anti-CSRF tokens or unique validation parameters - the vulnerability is exploitable
-
Verify SameSite cookie configurationUse browser developer tools or a web proxy to inspect the Set-Cookie headers and cookie attributes for the application session cookies. Check if SameSite attribute is set to Strict or LaxAffected if Session cookies lack SameSite attribute or have it set to None - the application is vulnerable to cross-origin CSRF attacks
The environment is affected if FactoryTalk Vantagepoint version is lower than 8.40 AND the application lacks anti-CSRF token validation for state-changing requests or does not use SameSite cookie attributes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.40
Implement anti-CSRF tokens or token-based validation for state-changing requests, and configure SameSite cookie attributes to prevent cross-origin requests from being processed by the application.
FactoryTalk Vantagepoint 8.40 or later
- Check current FactoryTalk Vantagepoint version by navigating to the system information or about section in the application
- Contact Rockwell Automation through their official support channels (rockwellautomation.custhelp.com) to obtain the upgrade to version 8.40 or later
- Review release notes and upgrade documentation provided by Rockwell Automation before proceeding
- Perform the upgrade in a non-production/test environment first to verify compatibility with existing systems and integrations
- Schedule a maintenance window for the production upgrade to minimize business impact
- Execute the upgrade following Rockwell Automation's official installation procedures
- After upgrade, verify the installation was successful and test that FactoryTalk Vantagepoint functions normally
- Confirm the version has been updated to 8.40 or later to ensure the CSRF vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2444 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2444 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data