CVE-2023-24461
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS and may allow an attacker to impersonate a BIG-IP APM system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS fails to properly validate server certificates during SSL/TLS connections, allowing an attacker to present a malicious certificate and impersonate the legitimate BIG-IP APM system. This enables man-in-the-middle attacks where traffic can be intercepted or redirected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.2.2, < 7.2.4.1>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.8>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.3>= 17.0.0, <= 17.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BIG-IP Edge Client installationOn Windows, check Program Files/F5 Networks/BIG-IP Edge Client folder or open Programs and Features. On macOS, run 'ls /Applications | grep -i "BIG-IP Edge"' in TerminalAffected if The BIG-IP Edge Client is present on the system
-
Determine installed client versionOn Windows, right-click the client in Programs and Features and select Properties to view the version, or open the client and check Help > About. On macOS, right-click the app in Applications and select Get Info, or run 'mdls -name kMDItemVersion /Applications/BIG-IP\ Edge\ Client.app'Affected if Version falls within affected ranges: >= 7.2.2 and < 7.2.4.1; or >= 13.1.0 through 13.1.5; or >= 14.1.0 through 14.1.5; or >= 15.1.0 through 15.1.8; or >= 16.1.0 through 16.1.3; or >= 17.0.0 through 17.1.0
-
Confirm client is used for APM connectionsOpen the BIG-IP Edge Client and review configured connections or profiles. Look for connection entries that target BIG-IP Access Policy Manager serversAffected if The client has active or configured connections to BIG-IP APM systems
-
Inspect certificate validation configurationIn the client connection settings, locate SSL/TLS or certificate validation options. Check whether server certificate verification is enabled, disabled, or set to trust all certificatesAffected if Server certificate validation is disabled or set to trust any certificate
The system is affected if the BIG-IP Edge Client is installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND is configured to connect to BIG-IP APM servers, with certificate validation disabled or improperly configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.2.4.1
Update the BIG-IP Edge Client to a patched version that properly validates server certificates. Ensure the client is configured to trust only the legitimate BIG-IP APM server's certificate chain.
7.2.4.1 or later (7.2.x branch); 13.1.5.1 or later (13.1.x branch); 14.1.5.1 or later (14.1.x branch); 15.1.8.1 or later (15.1.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of BIG-IP APM using 'tmsh show sys version' or the web management interface.
- 2. For 7.2.x branch: Upgrade to version 7.2.4.1 or later.
- 3. For 13.1.x branch: Upgrade to version 13.1.5.1 or later (or the latest available supported version).
- 4. For 14.1.x branch: Upgrade to version 14.1.5.1 or later (or the latest available supported version).
- 5. For 15.1.x branch: Upgrade to version 15.1.8.1 or later (or the latest available supported version).
- 6. After upgrade, verify the BIG-IP Edge Client functionality and confirm the certificate validation is working correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-24461 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-24461 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data