Netiq Advanced AuthenticationApplication · Microfocus

CVE-2023-24468

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-03-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.3 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Broken access control in Advanced Authentication versions prior to 6.4.1.1 and 6.3.7.2

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Broken access control vulnerability in Advanced Authentication versions prior to 6.4.1.1 and 6.3.7.2 allows attackers to bypass authentication mechanisms and gain unauthorized access to the authentication system or protected resources.

MitigationUpgrade Advanced Authentication to version 6.4.1.1 or 6.3.7.2 or later to address the broken access control vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Netiq Advanced AuthenticationApplication
Affected:< 6.3= 6.3= 6.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Find installed version of NetIQ Advanced Authentication
    Check the installed programs list, product documentation, or use the product's version command or configuration file to determine the exact version number of Advanced Authentication installed in your environment
    Affected if The installed version is < 6.3, or equals 6.3.x, or equals 6.4.x (any version of 6.4 up to but not including 6.4.1.1)
  2. Confirm version is within vulnerable range
    Compare your installed version against the known affected versions: any version less than 6.3, version 6.3 (all 6.3.x versions), or version 6.4 (all 6.4.x versions up to 6.4.1.0)
    Affected if Your version is 6.3.x or 6.4.x where x is any subversion, or less than 6.3
  3. Verify version is NOT patched
    Confirm the installed version is not 6.3.7.2 or 6.4.1.1 or later (the patched versions that address this CVE)
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.3.7.2 or earlier than 6.4.1.1

You are affected if NetIQ Advanced Authentication is installed and the version number is less than 6.3.7.2 or less than 6.4.1.1 (specifically any version < 6.3, any 6.3.x version, or any 6.4.x version before 6.4.1.1).

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.3 or later
Fixed in 6.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Advanced Authentication to version 6.4.1.1 or 6.3.7.2 or later to address the broken access control vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

6.3.7.2 for 6.3.x branch or 6.4.1.1 for 6.4.x branch

  1. Identify the currently installed NetIQ Advanced Authentication version to determine the appropriate upgrade path
  2. For versions 6.3.x: Upgrade to version 6.3.7.2
  3. For versions 6.4.x: Upgrade to version 6.4.1.1
  4. Download the appropriate fixed version from the official NetIQ product download portal
  5. Follow NetIQ's standard upgrade procedure for Advanced Authentication, including backing up the current configuration
  6. After upgrade, verify the version to confirm the patch was applied successfully
Caveat Review NetIQ release notes for the target version to check for any configuration or behavioral changes that may affect your deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Netiq Advanced Authentication Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,480
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-24468 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-24468 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data