ColorwayWordPress extension · Inkthemes

CVE-2023-25447

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.2.3 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Inkthemescom ColorWay theme <= 4.2.3 versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ColorWay WordPress theme by Inkthemes affecting versions 4.2.3 and below. Attackers can exploit this to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions like modifying theme settings, creating malicious redirects, or changing content.

MitigationUpdate ColorWay theme to the latest patched version. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and AJAX requests within the theme as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ColorwayWordPress extension
Affected:<= 4.2.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm ColorWay theme is installed
    Navigate to Appearance > Themes in WordPress admin dashboard and verify the ColorWay theme by Inkthemes appears in the themes list, or inspect the /wp-content/themes/ directory for a colorway folder.
    Affected if The ColorWay theme is present in the WordPress installation.
  2. Check installed theme version
    Open the style.css file in /wp-content/themes/colorway/ and locate the 'Version:' header in the theme comments, or view the theme details in Appearance > Themes to see the version number.
    Affected if The reported version is 4.2.3 or lower.
  3. Inspect theme for CSRF token implementation
    Examine theme PHP files (especially those handling form submissions and AJAX requests in /wp-content/themes/colorway/) for the presence of nonces or CSRF tokens. Search for 'wp_nonce' or 'csrf_token' in theme files.
    Affected if Theme files lack nonce verification on state-changing forms and AJAX endpoints.
  4. Check theme settings pages for CSRF protection
    Access the ColorWay theme settings in WordPress admin (typically under Appearance > ColorWay Options or similar) and inspect the HTML source of any forms to verify they include hidden CSRF token fields.
    Affected if Forms for modifying theme settings, redirects, or content lack CSRF token hidden input fields.
  5. Verify admin session accessibility
    Confirm that administrator accounts exist and have access to the ColorWay theme settings panel, as CSRF attacks require an authenticated administrator session.
    Affected if Administrator users can access theme configuration pages without additional CSRF protection.

The environment is affected if the ColorWay theme version is 4.2.3 or lower and the theme lacks anti-CSRF token protections on its forms and AJAX handlers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.2.3
Interim mitigation

Update ColorWay theme to the latest patched version. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and AJAX requests within the theme as a defense-in-depth measure.

Fix this in Colorway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-25447 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-25447 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data