CVE-2023-25519
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNVIDIA ConnectX Host Firmware for the BlueField Data Processing Unit contains a vulnerability where a restricted host may cause an incorrect user management error. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to escalation of privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNVIDIA ConnectX Host Firmware for BlueField DPUs contains a vulnerability where a restricted or low-privilege host can trigger an incorrect user management error, allowing an attacker to escalate privileges. The flaw appears to be in the firmware's user management subsystem where improper authorization checks permit privilege elevation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 18.24.1000< 24.35.3006< 24.38.1002< 32.38.1002CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BlueField DPU hardwareCheck system hardware inventory or look for Mellanox/NVIDIA BlueField DPU cards installed in the system. On Linux, `lspci | grep -i bluefield` or `ip link show` may reveal the device.Affected if No BlueField DPU is present in the environment
-
Retrieve installed firmware versionUse NVIDIA/Mellanox tools to query firmware. Run `mlxfwmanager` or `mstflint -d <device>` on the host, or access the BlueField BMC/ARM management interface to view firmware version information.Affected if Unable to retrieve firmware version from the DPU
-
Compare firmware version to affected rangesMatch the installed firmware version against: BlueField 1: >= 18.24.1000 (affected); BlueField 2 LTS: < 24.35.3006 (affected); BlueField 2 GA: < 24.38.1002 (affected); BlueField 3 GA: < 32.38.1002 (affected).Affected if Installed version falls within any affected range listed
-
Verify user management configurationCheck if the firmware has user management features enabled and if low-privilege host access to user management functions is permitted. This may require reviewing BMC/ARM user accounts or firmware security settings.Affected if User management subsystem is accessible to restricted host users
The environment is affected if a BlueField DPU is present with firmware version matching the affected ranges, and the user management subsystem allows low-privilege host access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.35.300624.38.100232.38.1002
Apply the latest NVIDIA firmware update for BlueField DPUs after consulting NVIDIA's security bulletin. Verify the firmware version and test in a staging environment before production deployment.
Bluefield 2 LTS: 24.35.3006+ | Bluefield 2 GA: 24.38.1002+ | Bluefield 3 GA: 32.38.1002+ | Bluefield 1: contact NVIDIA
- 1. Identify the Bluefield model number (BF-1, BF-2, or BF-3) and current firmware version using NVIDIA documentation or the system's BMC/ARM management interface
- 2. For Bluefield 2 LTS: Upgrade firmware to version 24.35.3006 or later
- 3. For Bluefield 2 GA: Upgrade firmware to version 24.38.1002 or later
- 4. For Bluefield 3 GA: Upgrade firmware to version 32.38.1002 or later
- 5. For Bluefield 1: Contact NVIDIA support for available fixed firmware versions as the CVE coverage appears to be version-dependent
- 6. Download the appropriate firmware bundle from NVIDIA's official support portal (nvidia.custhelp.com)
- 7. Follow NVIDIA's documented firmware update procedure for the Bluefield DPU, ensuring proper backup of current configuration
- 8. After upgrade, verify the new firmware version is applied and test that user management functionality operates correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-25519 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-25519 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data