CVE-2023-25722
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA credential-leak issue was discovered in related Veracode products before 2023-03-27. Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin before 23.3.19.0, when configured for remote agent jobs, invokes the Veracode Java API Wrapper in a manner that allows local users (with OS-level access of the Jenkins remote) to discover Veracode API credentials by listing the process and its arguments. Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin before 23.3.19.0, when configured for remote agent jobs and when the "Connect using proxy" option is enabled and configured with proxy credentials, allows local users of the Jenkins remote to discover proxy credentials by listing the process and its arguments. Veracode Azure DevOps Extension before 3.20.0 invokes the Veracode Java API Wrapper in a manner that allows local users (with OS-level access to the Azure DevOps Services cloud infrastructure or Azure DevOps Server) to discover Veracode API credentials by listing the process and its arguments. Veracode Azure DevOps Extension before 3.20.0, when configured with proxy credentials, allows users (with shell access to the Azure DevOps Services cloud infrastructure or Azure DevOps Server) to discover proxy credentials by listing the process and its arguments.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin (before 23.3.19.0) and Veracode Azure DevOps Extension (before 3.20.0) invoke the Veracode Java API Wrapper in a manner that passes credentials as command-line arguments. Local users with OS-level access can discover Veracode API credentials and proxy credentials by listing running processes and examining their arguments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 23.3.19.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin versionNavigate to Jenkins Manage Plugins > Installed tab and locate the Veracode Scan plugin, or check the plugin's manifest file in the Jenkins plugins directoryAffected if The installed version is earlier than 23.3.19.0
-
Identify Veracode Azure DevOps Extension versionAccess Azure DevOps organization settings > Extensions and locate the Veracode extension, or query the extension via az extension show --name veracode-scanAffected if The installed version is earlier than 3.20.0
-
Inspect running processes for credential exposureUse system commands such as ps auxww or Get-Process on Windows to list all running processes and examine command-line arguments for the presence of API credentials, proxy credentials, or Veracode-related secretsAffected if Veracode API credentials or proxy credentials appear in any process command-line arguments
A user is affected if they have a Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin version before 23.3.19.0 or a Veracode Azure DevOps Extension version before 3.20.0, AND credentials are discoverable in running process command lines.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped23.3.19.0
Update to Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin 23.3.19.0 or later, and Veracode Azure DevOps Extension 3.20.0 or later. Additionally, rotate any credentials that may have been exposed as a precautionary measure.
Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin 23.3.19.0; Veracode Azure DevOps Extension 3.20.0
- Upgrade Veracode Scan Jenkins Plugin to version 23.3.19.0 or later via Jenkins plugin manager
- Upgrade Veracode Azure DevOps Extension to version 3.20.0 or later via Azure DevOps extension marketplace
- After upgrading, verify that credentials are no longer exposed in process arguments by reviewing the plugin/extension configuration and running process listing commands
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-25722 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-25722 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data