CVE-2023-25806
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenSearch Security is a plugin for OpenSearch that offers encryption, authentication and authorization. There is an observable discrepancy in the authentication response time between calls where the user provided exists and calls where it does not. This issue only affects calls using the internal basic identity provider (IdP), and not other externally configured IdPs. Patches were released in versions 1.3.9 and 2.6.0, there are no workarounds.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpenSearch Security plugin has a timing side-channel vulnerability in the internal basic identity provider. Authentication requests for existing users take measurably different time than requests for non-existing users, allowing username enumeration via timing attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3.9>= 2.0.0, < 2.6.0< 1.3.9>= 2.0.0, < 2.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OpenSearch versionCheck the installed OpenSearch version via the OpenSearch dashboard (click on the logo shows version) or by querying the _cluster/state API or checking the opensearch-node process binary versionAffected if Version is less than 1.3.9 OR between 2.0.0 and 2.6.0 (excluding 2.6.0)
-
Identify OpenSearch Security plugin versionQuery the _plugins/security API endpoint or check the plugins directory on each node for the security plugin versionAffected if Security plugin version is less than 1.3.9 OR between 2.0.0 and 2.6.0 (excluding 2.6.0)
-
Confirm Security plugin is enabledVerify the Security plugin is active by checking if _plugins/security returns a valid response, or confirm security configuration files exist in the config directoryAffected if Security plugin is installed and active (default in Amazon OpenSearch)
-
Check if internal basic identity provider is in useReview the internal_user_database setting in the Security plugin configuration (config.yml or via _plugins/security/authinfo API). Also check if basic authentication is configured in the authentication chain.Affected if internal_user_database is enabled or basic auth is configured to use the internal identity provider (this is the default configuration)
You are affected if you are running any OpenSearch or OpenSearch Security plugin version in the ranges < 1.3.9 OR >= 2.0.0 and < 2.6.0, and the Security plugin with internal basic authentication is enabled (default configuration).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.92.6.0
Upgrade OpenSearch Security plugin to version 1.3.9 or 2.6.0. No workarounds are available.
1.3.9 for OpenSearch 1.x branches; 2.6.0 for OpenSearch 2.x branches
- 1. Determine current OpenSearch version by checking the cluster or nodes endpoint
- 2. If running OpenSearch 1.x (e.g., 1.3.8 or lower), upgrade to version 1.3.9
- 3. If running OpenSearch 2.x (e.g., 2.0.0-2.5.x), upgrade to version 2.6.0
- 4. Ensure OpenSearch Security plugin version matches the OpenSearch server version (both must be upgraded together)
- 5. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
- 6. After upgrade, verify authentication works correctly with the internal basic IdP
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-25806 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-25806 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data