ZendropWordPress extension
CVE-2023-25960
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Zendrop Zendrop – Global Dropshipping zendrop-dropshipping-and-fulfillment allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Zendrop – Global Dropshipping: from n/a through 1.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the Zendrop WordPress plugin allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input, potentially enabling data exfiltration, authentication bypass, or complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
ZendropWordPress extension
= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Zendrop plugin filesNavigate to /wp-content/plugins/ directory and check if a folder named 'zendrop' or similar exists. In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for Zendrop.Affected if The Zendrop plugin folder exists in the plugins directory or appears in the WordPress admin plugins list.
-
Identify installed versionIf the plugin is found, open the main plugin file (usually zendrop.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) and look for a version comment or header: 'Version: x.x.x' or similar. Alternatively, in WordPress admin, click on the plugin name to view version details.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.0.
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, verify whether Zendrop shows as 'Active' rather than 'Inactive' or 'Must-Use'.Affected if The Zendrop plugin is currently active.
-
Check for SQL-related database interactionsReview the plugin code for dynamic SQL query construction (functions like $wpdb->query, $wpdb->prepare with direct string concatenation, or direct query execution). Focus on files handling user input such as search, filter, or form submission handlers.Affected if The plugin code contains dynamic SQL queries that incorporate user-supplied input without proper sanitization or parameterized queries.
You are affected if the Zendrop WordPress plugin version 1.0.0 is installed and active, with unsanitized user input reaching database queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements and implement proper input validation and escaping for all user-supplied data before database operations.
Fix this in Zendrop
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-25960 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-25960 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data