CVE-2023-26052
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSaleor is a headless, GraphQL commerce platform delivering personalized shopping experiences. Some internal Python exceptions are not handled properly and thus are returned in API as error messages. Some messages might contain sensitive information like infrastructure details in unauthenticated requests. This issue has been patched in versions 3.1.48, 3.7.59, 3.8.0, 3.9.27, 3.10.14 and 3.11.12.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSaleor GraphQL commerce platform returns unhandled internal Python exceptions directly in API responses. These error messages can expose sensitive infrastructure details to unauthenticated users, creating an information disclosure vulnerability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 3.1.48>= 3.2.0, < 3.7.59>= 3.8.0, < 3.8.30>= 3.9.0, < 3.9.27>= 3.10.0, < 3.10.14>= 3.11.0, < 3.11.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Saleor versionRun 'pip show saleor' or check your package management system to find the installed version of the Saleor packageAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: >= 2.0.0 and < 3.1.48, >= 3.2.0 and < 3.7.59, >= 3.8.0 and < 3.8.30, >= 3.9.0 and < 3.9.27, >= 3.10.0 and < 3.10.14, or >= 3.11.0 and < 3.11.12
-
Locate the GraphQL API endpointIdentify the URL of your Saleor GraphQL endpoint (commonly /graphql/ or /api/graphql/)Affected if The endpoint is publicly accessible to unauthenticated users
-
Test for error information disclosureSend a malformed GraphQL query to your endpoint (such as a query with invalid syntax or a field that does not exist) and inspect the response for full Python exception details, stack traces, file paths, or internal variable valuesAffected if The response contains detailed Python exception messages, stack traces, or internal infrastructure information instead of a generic error message
You are affected if your installed Saleor version is within the affected ranges AND your GraphQL API is accessible to unauthenticated users who can trigger errors that expose internal exception details.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.1.483.7.593.8.30
Upgrade to one of the patched versions (3.1.48, 3.7.59, 3.8.0, 3.9.27, 3.10.14, or 3.11.12). As a temporary mitigation, ensure the production environment does not expose detailed error traces.
3.11.12 (latest stable release containing all CVE-2023-26052 patches)
- 1. Identify the currently running Saleor version using your package manager or deployment configuration
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (e.g., 3.1.x, 3.7.x, 3.8.x, 3.9.x, 3.10.x, or 3.11.x)
- 3. Upgrade to the appropriate patched version for your branch: if on 3.1.x upgrade to 3.1.48, if on 3.2.x-3.7.x upgrade to 3.7.59, if on 3.8.x upgrade to 3.8.30, if on 3.9.x upgrade to 3.9.27
- 4. Alternatively, upgrade to the latest stable version 3.11.12 which contains all security patches
- 5. Update your package dependencies (e.g., pip install saleor==3.11.12 or update your requirements.txt)
- 6. Test the upgrade in a staging environment to verify the patch resolves the error message exposure
- 7. Deploy the upgraded version to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-26052 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-26052 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data