Safe EvalApplication · Safe Eval Project

CVE-2023-26121

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-04-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.4.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
All versions of the package safe-eval are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via the safeEval function, due to improper sanitization of its parameter content.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The safe-eval package contains a Prototype Pollution vulnerability in its safeEval function due to improper sanitization of input parameters. An attacker can manipulate object prototypes by injecting malicious properties through unsanitized input, potentially leading to code execution or application disruption.

MitigationReplace safe-eval with a properly sandboxed alternative (such as vm2, isolated-vm, or native vm module with strict controls), or upgrade if a patched version becomes available. Audit all code paths using safeEval to identify exploitation vectors.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Safe EvalApplication
Affected:<= 0.4.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed safe-eval package version
    Run 'npm list safe-eval' in your project directory to see the installed version, or inspect package.json dependencies
    Affected if The version is 0.4.1 or lower
  2. Verify safeEval is being called in your codebase
    Search your codebase for occurrences of 'safeEval(' or 'safe-eval' import statements to identify where the function is used
    Affected if Your code imports or calls the safeEval function from the safe-eval package
  3. Inspect input sources to safeEval calls
    Trace the arguments passed to safeEval calls and identify whether any originate from user input (HTTP requests, CLI arguments, environment variables, or external APIs)
    Affected if User-controllable data flows into safeEval without sanitization
  4. Review existing input sanitization
    Examine the code immediately before safeEval calls to see if any validation, sanitization, or filtering is performed on the input arguments
    Affected if No sanitization is applied, or sanitization does not specifically block prototype pollution patterns (__proto__, constructor, prototype)

You are affected if you have safe-eval version 0.4.1 or lower and your code passes unsanitized user input to the safeEval function.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.4.1
Interim mitigation

Replace safe-eval with a properly sandboxed alternative (such as vm2, isolated-vm, or native vm module with strict controls), or upgrade if a patched version becomes available. Audit all code paths using safeEval to identify exploitation vectors.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Replace with an actively maintained alternative (safe-eval appears unmaintained with no fixed version available)

  1. 1. Audit your codebase to identify all usages of the safe-eval package
  2. 2. Search for an actively maintained alternative to safe-eval that provides similar functionality (e.g., vm2 with proper configuration, or native Node.js vm module with restrictions)
  3. 3. Replace all safe-eval calls with the chosen alternative implementation
  4. 4. Test the application thoroughly to ensure functionality is preserved
  5. 5. Remove safe-eval from package.json and install the replacement package
  6. 6. Run security scans to confirm the vulnerability is no longer present
Caveat Migration to a new library will require code changes; test thoroughly as behavior may differ

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Safe Eval Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-26121 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-26121 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data