CVE-2023-26456
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUsers were able to set an arbitrary "product name" for OX Guard. The chosen value was not sufficiently sanitized before processing it at the user interface, allowing for indirect cross-site scripting attacks. Accounts that were temporarily taken over could be configured to trigger persistent code execution, allowing an attacker to build a foothold. Sanitization is in place for product names now. No publicly available exploits are known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in OX Guard where users could set an arbitrary product name that was not properly sanitized before rendering in the user interface. The unsanitized input allowed indirect XSS attacks, enabling attackers who temporarily took over accounts to configure persistent code execution and establish a foothold.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.10.7= 2.10.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OX Guard versionCheck the installed OX Guard package version using your system package manager (dpkg -l | grep guard or rpm -qa | grep guard) or access the OX Guard admin interface and look for version information in the system settings or about page.Affected if The installed version is 2.10.7 or lower (any version < 2.10.7 or exactly 2.10.7)
-
Locate product name settingAccess the OX Guard administrative interface and navigate to the product branding or settings section where the product name is configured. This may also be stored in OX Guard configuration files depending on your deployment.Affected if You can access and view the product name configuration setting in the OX Guard admin panel or configuration files
-
Inspect product name for unsanitized inputView the current product name value and examine the rendered HTML in the browser developer tools or view page source. Check if special characters like <, >, ", or ' are being rendered as plain text or executed as HTML/JavaScript.Affected if The product name contains raw HTML or JavaScript (such as script tags, event handlers like onload, onerror, or javascript: URIs) that executes when the page renders
You are affected if OX Guard version is 2.10.7 or lower AND the product name field contains malicious script that executes in the browser when viewed by other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.7
The description indicates sanitization is now in place for product names. Organizations should verify they have deployed the patched version containing the fix.
Ox Guard 2.10.8 or later
- 1. Identify the current Ox Guard version installed in your environment
- 2. Download the latest Ox Guard release from the official Open-Xchange software repository (software.open-xchange.com)
- 3. Review the release notes for version 2.10.8 or later to confirm the XSS fix is included
- 4. Plan maintenance window - schedule during low-usage period
- 5. Backup current Ox Guard configuration and data
- 6. Upgrade Ox Guard to version 2.10.8 or later
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful and the product name field now properly sanitizes input
- 8. Test that the product name functionality works correctly with special characters
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-26456 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-26456 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data