CVE-2023-27074
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBP Monitoring Management System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the emailid parameter in the login page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBP Monitoring Management System v1.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the emailid parameter on the login page. Attackers can inject malicious SQL queries through this parameter to manipulate database queries, potentially allowing unauthorized access to the application, data exfiltration, or complete database compromise. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 reflects the ease of exploitation and severe potential impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed applicationInspect the web application interface, check the page footer, or examine the application files for the name 'BP Monitoring Management System' or 'Bp Monitoring Management System'Affected if The application is identified as BP Monitoring Management System from Phpgurukul
-
Confirm the exact version numberCheck the application's version information, typically found in the footer, an 'About' page, or configuration files. Common paths include the root directory index page, a version.php file, or admin dashboard.Affected if The version is 1.0 exactly (this is the only affected version)
-
Locate the login page with emailid parameterAccess the application's login page and view the page source or intercept the HTTP request to identify the form parameters. Look for an input field named 'emailid' in the login form.Affected if The login form contains a parameter named 'emailid' that accepts user input
-
Verify the application uses direct SQL queries for loginIf code access is available, examine the backend login processing script (often login.php or similar) to check if the emailid parameter is directly concatenated into SQL queries without using prepared statements or parameter binding.Affected if The login code constructs SQL queries by directly inserting the emailid parameter into the query string without parameterized queries
A defender is affected if they have Phpgurukul BP Monitoring Management System version 1.0 running with the login page accessible and the emailid parameter present in the login form without prepared statement protection in the backend code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations involving user input, specifically the emailid parameter. Additionally, apply input validation and output encoding. Restrict application access until a security patch is applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27074 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27074 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data