Pathfinder For Risc VApplication · Intel

CVE-2023-27386

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Uncontrolled search path in some Intel(R) Pathfinder for RISC-V software may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Intel Pathfinder for RISC-V software contains an uncontrolled search path vulnerability where the application loads executables or libraries without using a fully qualified path, allowing an authenticated local attacker to place a malicious file in a location the application searches, potentially achieving privilege escalation.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Intel when available. In the interim, ensure the application runs from trusted directories only and restrict write access to directories in the search path to prevent binary planting.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pathfinder For Risc VApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Intel Pathfinder for RISC-V is installed
    Check installed programs list in Control Panel or use 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName' in PowerShell to list installed software. Look for 'Intel Pathfinder for RISC-V'
    Affected if The software is present on the system, indicating a potential attack surface
  2. Identify the application executable location
    Locate the main executable (typically in Program Files or Program Files (x86) under Intel/Pathfinder). Note the directory path from which the application is launched
    Affected if The application runs from a directory with write access to non-privileged users, allowing binary planting
  3. Check directory permissions on application folder
    Right-click the installation folder, go to Properties > Security, and verify which users have Write or Modify permissions. Use 'icacls <path>' command for detailed ACL review
    Affected if Non-admin users have Write or Modify access to directories in the application's search path
  4. Inspect application directory for unexpected files
    List all files in the application directory using 'dir' or File Explorer. Look for unexpected .dll, .exe, or .config files, especially those with recent modification dates or suspicious names
    Affected if Unexpected executables or libraries exist in the application directory that could be loaded by the vulnerable application
  5. Review process behavior during application startup
    Use Process Monitor (from Sysinternals) to capture DLL and executable loading events when launching Intel Pathfinder for RISC-V. Filter by the process name and examine Load Image events
    Affected if The application loads any DLL or executable from directories that are not fully qualified paths or from user-writable locations

A user is affected if Intel Pathfinder for RISC-V is installed and runs from directories where untrusted users have write access, allowing potential DLL/executable planting attacks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Intel when available. In the interim, ensure the application runs from trusted directories only and restrict write access to directories in the search path to prevent binary planting.

Fix this in Pathfinder For Risc V Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,570
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27386 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27386 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data