CVE-2023-27396
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFINS (Factory Interface Network Service) is a message communication protocol, which is designed to be used in closed FA (Factory Automation) networks, and is used in FA networks composed of OMRON products. Multiple OMRON products that implement FINS protocol contain following security issues -- (1)Plaintext communication, and (2)No authentication required. When FINS messages are intercepted, the contents may be retrieved. When arbitrary FINS messages are injected, any commands may be executed on, or the system information may be retrieved from, the affected device. Affected products and versions are as follows: SYSMAC CS-series CPU Units, all versions, SYSMAC CJ-series CPU Units, all versions, SYSMAC CP-series CPU Units, all versions, SYSMAC NJ-series CPU Units, all versions, SYSMAC NX1P-series CPU Units, all versions, SYSMAC NX102-series CPU Units, all versions, and SYSMAC NX7 Database Connection CPU Units (Ver.1.16 or later)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe FINS protocol used by OMRON SYSMAC PLCs (CS, CJ, CP, NJ, NX1P, NX102, NX7 series) transmits all communications in plaintext and requires no authentication, allowing any network actor to intercept readable messages or inject arbitrary commands to execute functions or exfiltrate system data from affected CPU units.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OMRON PLC models in the environmentReview network scans, asset inventories, or physically inspect PLC hardware labels to determine if any CPU units from the CS, CJ, CP, NJ, NX1P, NX102, or NX7 series are presentAffected if Any of these PLC series are found in the environment
-
Verify FINS protocol is enabled on PLCsAccess the PLC programming software (CX-Programmer or Sysmac Studio) and check the PLC setup or network configuration for FINS protocol settings; look for FINS/UDP or FINS/TCP enabled statusAffected if FINS protocol is enabled on the CPU unit
-
Check network exposure of FINS service portsScan the network for open ports 9600/UDP and 9600/TCP (standard FINS ports) or perform a packet capture to detect FINS traffic on the networkAffected if FINS ports are accessible from network segments outside the local PLC communication zone
-
Verify NX7 firmware versionFor NX7 series PLCs specifically, check the firmware version through Sysmac Studio or the PLC hardware diagnostic screenAffected if The NX7 unit is running firmware version earlier than 1.16
If OMRON PLCs from the affected CS, CJ, CP, NJ, NX1P, NX102, or NX7 series are present AND FINS protocol is enabled, the environment is vulnerable to plaintext FINS traffic interception and injection attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate FINS-enabled devices behind network segmentation firewalls, block external FINS traffic at perimeter controls, and monitor for unauthorized FINS command activity; for NX7 units ensure version 1.16 or later is deployed.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27396 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27396 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data