Inactive User DeleterWordPress extension · Inactive User Deleter Project

CVE-2023-27424

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-07-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.60 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Korol Yuriy aka Shra Inactive User Deleter plugin <= 1.59 versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the Inactive User Deleter WordPress plugin versions 1.59 and below. The flaw allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into unknowingly triggering the deletion of inactive users by crafting malicious requests, as the plugin lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation on sensitive actions.

MitigationUpdate the plugin to a version beyond 1.59 if available, or deactivate and remove the plugin until a patched version is released. Additionally, consider implementing website-level CSRF protection mechanisms.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Inactive User DeleterWordPress extension
Affected:< 1.60

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Inactive User Deleter plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and search for 'Inactive User Deleter' in the list of installed plugins
    Affected if Plugin is present in the WordPress installation
  2. Identify the installed version
    In the Plugins list, click on 'Inactive User Deleter' to view the plugin details, or hover over the plugin name to see the version number displayed
    Affected if Version displayed is 1.59 or below
  3. Confirm the vulnerable configuration
    Access the plugin settings page (usually under Users or Settings in WordPress admin) and check if the inactive user deletion feature is enabled or configured
    Affected if Plugin version is below 1.60 AND the user deletion feature is active or configured
  4. Assess admin exposure
    Review WordPress user roles to identify administrators who have access to the plugin functionality
    Affected if There are authenticated administrators with access to the plugin who could unknowingly trigger deletion requests

User is affected if the Inactive User Deleter plugin version 1.59 or below is installed and active, with admin users who could be tricked into sending malicious deletion requests via CSRF.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.60 or later
Fixed in 1.60
Interim mitigation

Update the plugin to a version beyond 1.59 if available, or deactivate and remove the plugin until a patched version is released. Additionally, consider implementing website-level CSRF protection mechanisms.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.60

  1. Back up your WordPress site before making any changes
  2. Navigate to Dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. Find 'Inactive User Deleter' in the plugin list
  4. Click 'Update Now' if an update is available, or manually update to version 1.60
  5. Verify the plugin is running version 1.60 or later after updating
  6. Test that the plugin's user deletion functionality still works correctly

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Inactive User Deleter Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27424 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27424 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data