CVE-2023-27524
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSession Validation attacks in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1. Installations that have not altered the default configured SECRET_KEY according to installation instructions allow for an attacker to authenticate and access unauthorized resources. This does not affect Superset administrators who have changed the default value for SECRET_KEY config. All superset installations should always set a unique secure random SECRET_KEY. Your SECRET_KEY is used to securely sign all session cookies and encrypting sensitive information on the database. Add a strong SECRET_KEY to your `superset_config.py` file like: SECRET_KEY = <YOUR_OWN_RANDOM_GENERATED_SECRET_KEY> Alternatively you can set it with `SUPERSET_SECRET_KEY` environment variable.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Superset versions up to 2.0.1 use a default hardcoded SECRET_KEY that is used to sign session cookies and encrypt sensitive database information. Attackers who know this default key can forge valid session cookies, bypass authentication, and gain unauthorized administrative access to the Superset instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache Superset versionRun `pip show apache-superset` or `superset version` to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if version is 2.0.1 or lower
-
Locate the configuration fileFind superset_config.py in the path specified during installation, or check for SUPERSET_SECRET_KEY environment variableAffected if configuration file exists but SECRET_KEY is not explicitly set or uses the default value
-
Inspect the SECRET_KEY valueOpen superset_config.py and look for the SECRET_KEY setting, or run `echo $SUPERSET_SECRET_KEY` to check the environment variableAffected if SECRET_KEY is set to the known default value or is not defined (falling back to default)
-
Verify custom key generationConfirm that SECRET_KEY was generated using a cryptographically secure random generator rather than using a preset defaultAffected if SECRET_KEY matches the publicly documented default or was not changed from installation defaults
You are affected if running Apache Superset version 2.0.1 or lower and the SECRET_KEY has not been changed from the known default value.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace the default SECRET_KEY in superset_config.py (or via SUPERSET_SECRET_KEY environment variable) with a strong, cryptographically random value unique to the installation. All existing sessions should be invalidated after the change.
2.1.0 or later (any version after 2.0.1)
- 1. Generate a strong, random SECRET_KEY value (minimum 32 characters, use a cryptographically secure random generator)
- 2. Add or update the SECRET_KEY configuration in your superset_config.py file: SECRET_KEY = '<YOUR_NEW_RANDOM_SECRET_KEY>'
- 3. Alternatively, set the SUPERSET_SECRET_KEY environment variable with your new secret value
- 4. Restart all Superset services to apply the new configuration
- 5. Verify that existing sessions are invalidated and users need to re-authenticate with the new key
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27524 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27524 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data