CVE-2023-27912
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA maliciously crafted X_B file when parsed through Autodesk® AutoCAD® 2023 can force an Out-of-Bound Read. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or read sensitive data or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in Autodesk AutoCAD 2023's X_B file parser allows a maliciously crafted X_B file to trigger an out-of-bounds read. This memory access violation can be leveraged by attackers to cause application crashes, read sensitive process memory, or potentially achieve arbitrary code execution within the current process context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023, < 2023.1.3>= 2023, < 2023.1.3>= 2023, < 2023.1.3>= 2023, < 2023.1.3>= 2023, < 2023.1.3>= 2023, < 2023.1.3>= 2023, < 2023.1.3>= 2023, < 2023.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed AutoCAD product variantOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | DisplayName' in PowerShell to list installed Autodesk products. Look for AutoCAD, Advance Steel, Architecture, Civil 3D, Electrical, LT, Map 3D, or Mechanical.Affected if Any of these eight AutoCAD variants are present on the system.
-
Determine installed version numberIn the Programs and Features list, note the version column for the identified AutoCAD product. Alternatively, launch the AutoCAD application, go to Help > About Autodesk AutoCAD, and record the full version string shown in the license information dialog.Affected if A version is displayed that falls within the range 2023.0 through 2023.1.2.
-
Compare version to vulnerability rangeParse the version number found in the previous step. The vulnerable range is any version greater than or equal to 2023 but less than 2023.1.3. For example, 2023.0, 2023.1.0, 2023.1.1, and 2023.1.2 are all vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is 2023, 2023.1.0, 2023.1.1, or 2023.1.2 (or any 2023.x version below 2023.1.3).
-
Assess X_B file import exposureCheck whether users have the ability to import or open X_B files in the installed AutoCAD product. This can be done by attempting to use the INSERT command or checking if X_B is listed in the supported file type filters during the open/import workflow.Affected if X_B file import functionality is available and users routinely open files from external or untrusted sources.
The environment is affected if any of the eight AutoCAD 2023 product variants is installed with a version between 2023.0 and 2023.1.2 and users can import X_B files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2023.1.3
Users should avoid opening X_B files from untrusted sources. Organizations should apply Autodesk's security patches for AutoCAD 2023 when released and implement file filtering/validation for X_B file imports at the network perimeter.
Autocad 2023.1.3 (or later)
- 1. Close any running instances of AutoCAD 2023 or related products (AutoCAD Advance Steel, Architecture, Civil 3D, Electrical, LT, Map 3D, Mechanical)
- 2. Ensure all active drawings are saved and closed
- 3. Launch the Autodesk Access application or your preferred method for managing Autodesk product updates
- 4. Check for available updates for your specific AutoCAD 2023 product
- 5. Install the 2023.1.3 update or later version when prompted
- 6. Restart your computer if required by the installer
- 7. Verify the installed version by opening AutoCAD and checking Help > About AutoCAD to confirm version 2023.1.3 or higher is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27912 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27912 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data