JwordApplication · Independentsoft

CVE-2023-28152

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-03-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.1.110 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Independentsoft JWord before 1.1.110. The API is prone to XML external entity (XXE) injection via a remote DTD in a DOCX file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Independentsoft JWord library (versions before 1.1.110) is vulnerable to XML external entity (XXE) injection. The API processes DOCX files containing remote DTD references, allowing attackers to inject malicious XML external entities by supplying a crafted DOCX file with a remote DTD declaration.

MitigationUpgrade Independentsoft JWord to version 1.1.110 or later which contains the XXE vulnerability fix.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JwordApplication
Affected:< 1.1.110

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify JWord library version
    Locate the independentsoft-jword JAR file in your application classpath or build dependencies (e.g., check pom.xml, build.gradle, or the lib/ directory). Query the JAR manifest or consult your dependency management system for the exact version number.
    Affected if Version is below 1.1.110
  2. Confirm JWord DOCX processing is in use
    Review application code or configuration to determine if Independentsoft JWord is used to open, parse, or convert DOCX files. Look for imports such as 'com.independentsoft.word.Document' or similar JWord API calls.
    Affected if JWord processes DOCX files, especially from external or untrusted sources
  3. Check XML parser configuration
    Inspect how the application configures the XML parser used by JWord. Look for properties that control external entity resolution, such as 'javax.xml.XMLConstants.FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING' or custom XMLReader/SAXParserFactory settings.
    Affected if External entity resolution is not explicitly disabled (most default XML parsers allow external entities)

You are affected if your application runs Independentsoft JWord version below 1.1.110 and processes DOCX files using the library, particularly from untrusted or external sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.1.110 or later
Fixed in 1.1.110
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Independentsoft JWord to version 1.1.110 or later which contains the XXE vulnerability fix.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.1.110

  1. 1. Identify all deployments and applications using Independentsoft JWord
  2. 2. Check the current JWord version in use (consult project dependencies or runtime information)
  3. 3. Locate all references to the JWord library in dependency management files (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle, package.json)
  4. 4. Update the JWord dependency to version 1.1.110 or later
  5. 5. Rebuild and recompile the application with the updated dependency
  6. 6. Test the application to verify the upgrade does not introduce regressions
  7. 7. Redeploy the updated application to all affected environments
  8. 8. Verify the fix by testing DOCX file processing to confirm XXE is no longer exploitable

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jword Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,780
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-28152 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-28152 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data