OrvcApplication · Snapone

CVE-2023-28649

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Hub in the Snap One OvrC cloud platform is a device used to centralize and manage nested devices connected to it. A vulnerability exists in which an attacker could impersonate a hub and send device requests to claim already claimed devices. The OvrC cloud platform receives the requests but does not validate if the found devices are already managed by another user.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an authorization bypass vulnerability in the OvrC cloud platform where the system fails to validate device ownership before processing claim requests. An attacker can impersonate a hub and send device claims for devices already managed by another user, allowing unauthorized device hijacking.

MitigationImplement proper device ownership validation in the OvrC cloud platform to verify that devices are not already claimed by another user before processing any claim requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OrvcApplication
Affected:< 7.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the OvrC platform version
    Access the OvrC admin console or check the software package/version information for Snapone Orvc. Look for a version number in the system settings, about page, or command line interface if available.
    Affected if The installed version is any version lower than 7.3.0 (for example, 7.2.x, 7.1.x, etc.)
  2. Check the OvrC service exposure
    Determine if the OvrC cloud platform is accessible from external networks. Review firewall rules, NAT configurations, or reverse proxy settings that expose the OvrC service to the internet.
    Affected if The OvrC service is directly exposed to the internet without proper network segmentation or VPN protection
  3. Review device claim logs
    Examine the OvrC platform audit logs or access logs for device claim requests. Look for claim operations that may have occurred without proper authentication or authorization verification.
    Affected if There are device claim events in the logs that show claims for devices already owned by another user, or duplicate claim attempts

You are affected if your Snapone Orvc version is below 7.3.0 and the OvrC platform is accessible (either locally or externally) to process device claim requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.3.0 or later
Fixed in 7.3.0
Interim mitigation

Implement proper device ownership validation in the OvrC cloud platform to verify that devices are not already claimed by another user before processing any claim requests.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

7.3.0

  1. Upgrade Orvc to version 7.3.0 or later to remediate the vulnerability
  2. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the OvrC platform documentation or contacting Snap One support
  3. After upgrading, confirm that device ownership validation is now properly enforced in the OvrC cloud platform

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Orvc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-28649 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-28649 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data