CppcheckApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2023-28678

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-04-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.26 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Cppcheck Plugin 1.26 and earlier does not escape file names from Cppcheck report files before showing them on the Jenkins UI, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to control report file contents.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Cppcheck Plugin versions 1.26 and earlier fails to sanitize file names from Cppcheck report files before rendering them in the Jenkins UI. An attacker who can influence report file contents can inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the browsers of users viewing the report, resulting in stored XSS.

MitigationUpgrade the Cppcheck Plugin to version 1.27 or later, which implements proper output encoding for file names. If upgrade is not immediately possible, restrict access to who can upload/create Cppcheck report files and review existing reports for suspicious content.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CppcheckApplication
Affected:<= 1.26

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cppcheck Plugin is installed
    Navigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Cppcheck' in the list of installed plugins.
    Affected if The Cppcheck plugin appears in the installed plugins list.
  2. Determine the installed Cppcheck plugin version
    In the Installed Plugins page, locate the Cppcheck plugin and note the version number displayed in the 'Version' column.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.26 or earlier.
  3. Identify Cppcheck report usage in jobs
    Review Jenkins jobs that use the Cppcheck plugin by checking job configurations for 'Cppcheck' as a build step or post-build action. Identify any jobs that process Cppcheck XML report files.
    Affected if Jobs exist that import or display Cppcheck reports in Jenkins.
  4. Inspect stored Cppcheck report files for malicious content
    Locate Cppcheck report files in Jenkins workspaces or archived artifacts. Search the XML files for filename elements containing script tags, javascript: URIs, or other suspicious JavaScript code patterns.
    Affected if Any Cppcheck report files contain unsanitized script injection in filename fields.

A user is affected if the Cppcheck Plugin version is 1.26 or earlier and their Jenkins environment processes Cppcheck reports where attackers could inject malicious JavaScript into file name fields.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.26
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Cppcheck Plugin to version 1.27 or later, which implements proper output encoding for file names. If upgrade is not immediately possible, restrict access to who can upload/create Cppcheck report files and review existing reports for suspicious content.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Cppcheck Plugin version 1.27 or later

  1. Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
  2. Go to the 'Updates' tab
  3. Locate the Cppcheck Plugin in the list
  4. Click 'Update' to install the latest version (version 1.27 or later)
  5. Restart Jenkins if prompted or manually restart to ensure the update is fully applied

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Cppcheck Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-28678 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-28678 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data