CVE-2023-2868
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA remote command injection vulnerability exists in the Barracuda Email Security Gateway (appliance form factor only) product effecting versions 5.1.3.001-9.2.0.006. The vulnerability arises out of a failure to comprehensively sanitize the processing of .tar file (tape archives). The vulnerability stems from incomplete input validation of a user-supplied .tar file as it pertains to the names of the files contained within the archive. As a consequence, a remote attacker can specifically format these file names in a particular manner that will result in remotely executing a system command through Perl's qx operator with the privileges of the Email Security Gateway product. This issue was fixed as part of BNSF-36456 patch. This patch was automatically applied to all customer appliances.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRemote command injection in Barracuda Email Security Gateway (appliance) versions 5.1.3.001-9.2.0.006. Incomplete input validation of filenames within .tar archives allows attackers to craft malicious archive filenames that execute system commands via Perl's qx operator with appliance privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1.3.001, <= 9.2.0.006>= 5.1.3.001, <= 9.2.0.006>= 5.1.3.001, <= 9.2.0.006>= 5.1.3.001, <= 9.2.0.006>= 5.1.3.001, <= 9.2.0.006CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the appliance management interface or use the system status page to view the current firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is >= 5.1.3.001 and <= 9.2.0.006 (models 300, 400, 600, 800, 900)
-
Verify patch BNSF-36456 statusCheck the Barracuda dashboard or appliance management interface for the patch statusAffected if The patch has not been applied or the patch status cannot be confirmed
-
Determine if the appliance accepts .tar archive uploadsReview the appliance configuration to see if the feature allowing .tar file uploads is enabledAffected if The .tar upload feature is enabled and the appliance is in the affected version range
The environment is affected if the Barracuda Email Security Gateway firmware falls within 5.1.3.001-9.2.0.006 and the BNSF-36456 patch has not been applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedVerify appliance has received and applied the BNSF-36456 patch (automatic updates). If still on affected version, upgrade to patched release. Restrict network access to appliance management interfaces as defense-in-depth.
Firmware version 9.2.0.006 or later includes the BNSF-36456 patch
- Verify that the BNSF-36456 patch has been applied by checking the appliance's system status or firmware version
- If the appliance is running an affected version (< 9.2.0.006), ensure automatic updates are enabled to receive the patch
- Confirm the patch was successfully applied by reviewing the security update history in the appliance admin interface
- If the patch was not automatically applied, contact Barracuda Networks support for manual patch deployment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2868 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2868 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data