CVE-2023-28799
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA URL parameter during login flow was vulnerable to injection. An attacker could insert a malicious domain in this parameter, which would redirect the user after auth and send the authorization token to the redirected domain.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe login flow contains an insecure redirect parameter that accepts arbitrary domains. After successful authentication, the user is redirected to the attacker-controlled domain while the authorization token is appended to the redirect URL, enabling token exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.4< 1.9.3< 1.10.1< 1.10.2< 3.7< 3.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Zscaler Client Connector installationCheck Program Files for Zscaler Client Connector folder, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like "*Zscaler*"}' in PowerShellAffected if Zscaler Client Connector is installed on the system
-
Determine installed version numberRun 'Get-ItemProperty "C:\Program Files\Zscaler\ZSClient\ZSClient.exe" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object VersionInfo' or right-click the executable and view Properties > DetailsAffected if Version cannot be determined or shows an unlisted version
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version is less than 1.4, or between 1.4 and 1.9.2, or between 1.9.3 and 1.10.0, or between 1.10.1 and 1.10.1, or between 1.10.2 and 3.6, or between 3.7 and 3.8Affected if Installed version falls into any of these ranges: <1.4, <1.9.3, <1.10.1, <1.10.2, <3.7, <3.9
-
Verify login flow is accessibleConfirm Zscaler Client Connector is configured and users authenticate through it. Check if the client connects to Zscaler cloud and presents a login promptAffected if Users authenticate through the Zscaler Client Connector login flow (this is the vulnerable component)
If Zscaler Client Connector is installed and its version falls within any of the affected ranges, the environment is vulnerable to token-exfiltrating redirects during login.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.41.9.31.10.1
Implement strict allowlist validation for redirect URLs and remove tokens from redirect query parameters; use POST-based callbacks or server-side redirect validation instead.
Zscaler Client Connector 1.10.2 (or the latest 1.10.x release, or the appropriate fixed version for your branch: 1.4+ for 1.x, 1.9.3+ for 1.9.x)
- Identify the currently installed Zscaler Client Connector version by checking Help > About or using the client interface
- Determine the current major version branch (1.x, 1.9.x, or 1.10.x)
- Download the appropriate fixed version: If on 1.x branch, upgrade to 1.4 or later; If on 1.9.x branch, upgrade to 1.9.3 or later; If on 1.10.x branch, upgrade to 1.10.2 or later
- Obtain the installer from the official Zscaler portal or your organization's software distribution point
- Close the Zscaler Client Connector application before upgrading
- Run the installer with appropriate administrative privileges
- Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
- Verify the upgrade by checking the new version number in Help > About
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-28799 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-28799 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data