CVE-2023-28965
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions within the storm control feature of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker sending a high rate of traffic to cause a Denial of Service. Continued receipt and processing of these packets will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Storm control monitors the level of applicable incoming traffic and compares it with the level specified. If the combined level of the applicable traffic exceeds the specified level, the switch drops packets for the controlled traffic types. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10002: All versions prior to 19.3R3-S7; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S11; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the storm control feature of Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10002 switches allows an attacker sending high-rate traffic to cause a Denial of Service due to improper handling of exceptional conditions. The storm control feature fails to properly process the incoming traffic, leading to a sustained DoS condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 19.3= 19.3= 19.4= 20.2= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or check the physical device labeling to confirm the model is QFX10002Affected if Device is not a QFX10002 switch - the vulnerability only affects QFX10002
-
Check the Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if Version matches one of the affected releases: 19.3, 19.4, 20.2, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, or any version prior to 19.3
-
Verify storm control configurationRun 'show configuration storm-control' or inspect the storm control configuration in the switchAffected if Storm control is enabled or configured on any interface - the vulnerability triggers when storm control processes incoming traffic
-
Confirm the combination of factorsCross-reference: QFX10002 device + affected Junos version + active storm control configurationAffected if All three conditions are true: QFX10002 hardware, affected Junos version, and storm control feature is in use
A user is affected if they operate a QFX10002 switch running an affected Junos version (19.3 through 21.4) with storm control configured, as the DoS requires the storm control feature to process the incoming high-rate traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped19.3
Upgrade Junos OS to the fixed versions (19.3R3-S7 and later, 19.4R3-S11 and later, 20.2R3-S6 and later, 20.4R3-S5 and later, 21.1R3-S4 and later, 21.2R3-S3 and later, 21.3R3 and later, or 21.4R2 and later) as specified in the Juniper advisory.
Upgrade to the minimum fixed version for your branch: 19.3R3-S7 (19.3 branch), 19.4R3-S11 (19.4 branch), 20.2R3-S6 (20.2 branch), 20.4R3-S5 (20.4 branch), 21.1R3-S4 (21.1 branch), 21.2R3-S3 (21.2 branch), 21.3R3 (21.3 branch), or 21.4R2 (21.4 branch)
- Identify the current Junos OS version by running 'show version' on the device
- Determine which branch (19.3, 19.4, 20.2, etc.) your current version belongs to
- Download the appropriate fixed release from supportportal.juniper.net based on your branch: For 19.3 branch (QFX10002): 19.3R3-S7 or later; For 19.4 branch: 19.4R3-S11 or later; For 20.2 branch: 20.2R3-S6 or later; For 20.4 branch: 20.4R3-S5 or later; For 21.1 branch: 21.1R3-S4 or later; For 21.2 branch: 21.2R3-S3 or later; For 21.3 branch: 21.3R3 or later; For 21.4 branch: 21.4R2 or later
- Upload the upgrade package to the device using FTP/SCP or USB
- Initiate the software installation using 'request system software add <package>'
- Reboot the device to apply the upgrade using 'request system reboot'
- After reboot, verify the new version is installed using 'show version' and confirm storm control functionality is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-28965 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-28965 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data