Flask AppbuilderApplication · Dpgaspar

CVE-2023-29005

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-04-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Flask-AppBuilder versions before 4.3.0 lack rate limiting which can allow an attacker to brute-force user credentials. Version 4.3.0 includes the ability to enable rate limiting using `AUTH_RATE_LIMITED = True`, `RATELIMIT_ENABLED = True`, and setting an `AUTH_RATE_LIMIT`.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Flask-AppBuilder versions before 4.3.0 do not implement rate limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing attackers to repeatedly attempt credential combinations through brute-force attacks against the login mechanism.

MitigationUpgrade to Flask-AppBuilder 4.3.0 or later and enable rate limiting by setting AUTH_RATE_LIMITED = True, RATELIMIT_ENABLED = True, and configuring AUTH_RATE_LIMIT with appropriate thresholds.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Flask AppbuilderApplication
Affected:< 4.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Flask-AppBuilder version
    Run 'pip show flask-appbuilder' or import the package and print its version
    Affected if version is below 4.3.0
  2. Verify AUTH_RATE_LIMITED configuration
    Inspect your Flask config file (config.py) or application configuration for AUTH_RATE_LIMITED setting
    Affected if AUTH_RATE_LIMITED is not set to True or is missing
  3. Verify RATELIMIT_ENABLED configuration
    Inspect your Flask config file (config.py) or application configuration for RATELIMIT_ENABLED setting
    Affected if RATELIMIT_ENABLED is not set to True or is missing
  4. Verify AUTH_RATE_LIMIT configuration
    Inspect your Flask config file (config.py) or application configuration for AUTH_RATE_LIMIT setting
    Affected if AUTH_RATE_LIMIT is not defined or set to a permissive value

If Flask-AppBuilder version is below 4.3.0 AND rate limiting is not properly configured (AUTH_RATE_LIMITED, RATELIMIT_ENABLED, and AUTH_RATE_LIMIT), the environment is vulnerable to brute-force attacks on authentication endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.3.0 or later
Fixed in 4.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Flask-AppBuilder 4.3.0 or later and enable rate limiting by setting AUTH_RATE_LIMITED = True, RATELIMIT_ENABLED = True, and configuring AUTH_RATE_LIMIT with appropriate thresholds.

Recommended fix High confidence

Flask-AppBuilder >= 4.3.0

  1. Upgrade Flask-AppBuilder to version 4.3.0 or later using pip: pip install flask-appbuilder>=4.3.0
  2. In your configuration file (config.py or equivalent), add or update the following settings: Set AUTH_RATE_LIMITED = True to enable authentication rate limiting
  3. Set RATELIMIT_ENABLED = True to enable the rate limiting extension
  4. Set AUTH_RATE_LIMIT to specify the rate limit (example: AUTH_RATE_LIMIT = '5 per 15 minutes' or similar format supported by Flask-Limiter)
  5. Restart your Flask application to apply the new configuration
  6. Verify rate limiting is active by testing failed authentication attempts
Caveat Review Flask-Limiter dependency requirements if not already installed; no major breaking changes reported for this security update

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Flask Appbuilder Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29005 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data