FacschorusApplication · Bd

CVE-2023-29060

MEDIUM · 5.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-11-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The FACSChorus workstation operating system does not restrict what devices can interact with its USB ports. If exploited, a threat actor with physical access to the workstation could gain access to system information and potentially exfiltrate data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The FACSChorus workstation operating system lacks USB device restriction controls, allowing any USB device to be connected to the system. A threat actor with physical access could connect malicious USB devices (storage, HID emulators, or keyloggers) to access system information or exfiltrate data.

MitigationImplement USB port restriction controls via operating system policies and/or deploy physical USB port blockers to prevent unauthorized device connections.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FacschorusApplication
Affected:= 5.0= 5.1= 3.0= 3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Physical
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FACSChorus version
    Open the FACSChorus application and navigate to Help > About, or check the Windows Programs and Features list for 'BD FACSChorus' to confirm the installed version number
    Affected if The installed version is 3.0, 3.1, 5.0, or 5.1 - only these exact versions are affected
  2. Verify Windows USB restriction policy
    Open Local Group Policy Editor (gpedit.msc) and navigate to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > System > Device Installation. Check if 'Prevent installation of removable devices' is enabled, or check the equivalent registry key at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\DeviceInstall\Restrictions\DenyDeviceClasses
    Affected if The policy is not configured or is disabled, meaning USB device restrictions are not enforced
  3. Check USB device drivers status
    Open Device Manager and expand the 'Universal Serial Bus controllers' section. Look for USB mass storage device drivers or any USB devices that are currently connected or have been connected. Alternatively, run 'pnputil /enum-drivers' to list all installed USB driver packages
    Affected if USB mass storage drivers are present and no restrictive policies are in place to block them
  4. Inspect physical USB port controls
    Physically inspect all USB ports on the workstation for the presence of USB port blockers, locks, or physical obstruction devices. Also check if the system has software-based USB disablement via BIOS/UEFI settings
    Affected if No physical port blockers are present AND no BIOS-level USB disablement is configured AND no OS-level USB restriction policies are enabled

A system is affected if it runs FACSChorus version 3.0, 3.1, 5.0, or 5.1 AND lacks both OS-enforced USB restriction policies and physical USB port controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement USB port restriction controls via operating system policies and/or deploy physical USB port blockers to prevent unauthorized device connections.

Fix this in Facschorus Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29060 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29060 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data