CVE-2023-2915
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Rockwell Automation Thinmanager Thinserver is impacted by an improper input validation vulnerability, Due to improper input validation, a path traversal vulnerability exists when the ThinManager software processes a certain function. If exploited, an unauthenticated remote threat actor can delete arbitrary files with system privileges. A malicious user could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specifically crafted synchronization protocol message resulting in a denial-of-service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRockwell Automation ThinManager Thinserver contains a path traversal vulnerability due to improper input validation in its synchronization protocol handling. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted synchronization protocol messages to delete arbitrary files with system privileges or cause denial-of-service conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.0.0, <= 11.0.6>= 11.1.0, <= 11.1.6>= 11.2.0, <= 11.2.7>= 12.0.0, <= 12.0.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.0.0, <= 13.0.2= 13.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ThinManager Thinserver installationLocate ThinManager Thinserver on the system using software inventory or installed programs listingAffected if ThinManager Thinserver is not found on the system, the system is not affected by this vulnerability
-
Identify installed Thinserver versionUse the ThinManager interface, registry, or product documentation to retrieve the Thinserver version numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 11.0.0-11.0.6, 11.1.0-11.1.6, 11.2.0-11.2.7, 12.0.0-12.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.6, 13.0.0-13.0.2, or 13.1.0 exactly
-
Verify synchronization protocol exposureCheck ThinManager configuration settings or network listening services to determine if the synchronization protocol is enabled and accessibleAffected if The synchronization protocol is enabled and accepts remote connections from untrusted networks
-
Assess network accessibilityReview firewall rules, network ACLs, or service bindings to determine if ThinManager Thinserver is reachable from unauthenticated remote attackersAffected if Thinserver is exposed to untrusted network segments or the internet without authentication or access controls
The system is affected if ThinManager Thinserver is installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND the synchronization protocol is accessible to unauthenticated remote attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches or updates for ThinManager Thinserver. Until patched, restrict network access to ThinManager services and implement network segmentation to limit exposure from unauthenticated remote attackers.
Latest 11.0.7+, 11.1.7+, 11.2.8+, or 12.0.6+ (depending on your current major version branch)
- Identify the currently installed Thinmanager Thinserver version by checking the ThinManager administration interface or the installed software list
- Determine which version range your current installation falls into (11.0.x, 11.1.x, 11.2.x, or 12.0.x)
- Navigate to the Rockwell Automation ThinManager download page or contact Rockwell Automation technical support to obtain the latest version
- Download the appropriate updated version: For 11.0.x users, upgrade to 11.0.7 or later; For 11.1.x users, upgrade to 11.1.7 or later; For 11.2.x users, upgrade to 11.2.8 or later; For 12.0.x users, upgrade to 12.0.6 or later
- Before upgrading, backup the ThinManager configuration and any critical data
- Stop the ThinManager Thinserver service before performing the upgrade
- Install the new version following the standard ThinManager upgrade procedure
- Restart the ThinManager Thinserver service after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,576.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2915 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2915 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data