CVE-2023-29164
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in BMC Firmware for the Intel(R) Server Board S2600WF, Intel(R) Server Board S2600ST, Intel(R) Server Board S2600BP, before version 02.01.0017 and Intel(R) Server Board M50CYP and Intel(R) Server Board D50TNP before version R01.01.0009 may allow an authenticated user to enable escalation of privilege via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an improper access control vulnerability in the BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) firmware for multiple Intel server board models. An authenticated user with local access can escalate their privileges due to insufficient access control enforcement in the BMC firmware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Intel server board modelCheck the server chassis, motherboard label, or use IPMI command 'ipmitool raw 0x06 0x01' or access BMC web interface to view system information. Common affected models include S2600WF, S2600ST, S2600BP, M50CYP, and D50TNP.Affected if The server board is one of these models: S2600WF, S2600ST, S2600BP, M50CYP, or D50TNP.
-
Access the BMC firmware versionUse IPMI command 'ipmitool mc info' or access the BMC web interface under 'BMC Settings' or 'Firmware Information' to retrieve the current BMC firmware version.Affected if The BMC firmware version is returned by the command or interface.
-
Compare firmware version for S2600WF/ST/BP boardsIf the board is S2600WF, S2600ST, or S2600BP, compare the installed version against 02.01.0017. Versions below 02.01.0017 are affected.Affected if Board model is S2600WF/ST/BP AND BMC firmware version is earlier than 02.01.0017.
-
Compare firmware version for M50CYP and D50TNP boardsIf the board is M50CYP or D50TNP, compare the installed version against R01.01.0009. Versions below R01.01.0009 are affected.Affected if Board model is M50CYP or D50TNP AND BMC firmware version is earlier than R01.01.0009.
-
Verify local access capability existsReview physical access controls and user accounts on the BMC. Check for local user accounts configured via IPMI or BMC web interface under 'User Management'.Affected if Local user accounts exist on the BMC and physical access to the server is not strictly controlled.
The environment is affected if the Intel server board is an S2600WF/ST/BP model with BMC firmware below 02.01.0017, or an M50CYP/D50TNP model with BMC firmware below R01.01.0009, and local authenticated access is possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the BMC firmware to version 02.01.0017 or later for S2600WF/ST/BP boards, and version R01.01.0009 or later for M50CYP and D50TNP boards. Since local access is required for exploitation, ensure physical access controls are enforced and monitor for unauthorized local access.
Intel Server Board S2600WF/S2600ST/S2600BP to BMC firmware version 02.01.0017 or later; Intel Server Board M50CYP/D50TNP to BMC firmware version R01.01.0009 or later
- Identify the exact Intel Server Board model (S2600WF, S2600ST, S2600BP, M50CYP, or D50TNP) from the system label or BIOS/BMC information
- Download the latest BMC firmware for the specific board from the Intel Support website (downloadcenter.intel.com) or your system integrator
- Review the firmware release notes to confirm version 02.01.0017 (for S2600x family) or R01.01.0009 (for M50CYP/D50TNP) includes the security fix
- Follow the standard BMC firmware update procedure: typically requires logging into the BMC web interface or using tools like Intel BMC Utility, IPMItool, or BIOS update utilities
- Ensure stable power during the firmware update process - do not interrupt the flashing operation
- After update, verify the BMC firmware version reflects the patched release
- Confirm the fix by reviewing the BMC security settings and verifying the access control vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29164 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29164 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data