SapsetupApplication · Sap

CVE-2023-29187

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-04-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Windows user with basic user authorization can exploit a DLL hijacking attack in SapSetup (Software Installation Program) - version 9.0, resulting in a privilege escalation running code as administrator of the very same Windows PC. A successful attack depends on various preconditions beyond the attackers control.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A DLL hijacking vulnerability in SapSetup version 9.0 allows a Windows user with basic user authorization to escalate privileges to administrator by hijacking a DLL that the software loads during execution. The attacker places a malicious DLL in a location where SapSetup searches for DLLs, achieving arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges.

MitigationApply the vendor patch or update to SapSetup version 9.0 to address the DLL hijacking vulnerability. Restrict write access to directories in the DLL search path to prevent untrusted DLL placement.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SapsetupApplication
Affected:= 9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify SapSetup installation
    Check for SapSetup installation on the system by searching for the SapSetup executable in common program directories or via system inventory tools
    Affected if SapSetup version 9.0 is present on the system
  2. Confirm installed version
    Determine the exact version of SapSetup by examining the executable properties or using version detection methods appropriate for the software
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 9.0 (version equals 9.0)
  3. Identify DLL search paths used by SapSetup
    Monitor or analyze which directories SapSetup queries when loading DLLs during execution, using process monitoring or DLL search order documentation
    Affected if The DLL search path includes directories writable by non-privileged users
  4. Inspect DLL search path directories for unauthorized DLLs
    Examine directories in SapSetup's DLL search path for unexpected or suspicious DLL files that may have been placed by an attacker
    Affected if Foreign or malicious DLL files exist in directories where SapSetup searches for DLLs
  5. Review file permissions on DLL search path directories
    Check write permissions on directories in the DLL search path to determine if basic users can place files in those locations
    Affected if Non-privileged users have write access to directories in SapSetup's DLL search path

A user is affected if SapSetup version 9.0 is installed and directories in its DLL search path are writable by non-privileged users, allowing DLL hijacking.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch or update to SapSetup version 9.0 to address the DLL hijacking vulnerability. Restrict write access to directories in the DLL search path to prevent untrusted DLL placement.

Fix this in Sapsetup Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,770
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29187 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29187 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data