CVE-2023-29188
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP CRM WebClient UI - versions SAPSCORE 129, S4FND 102, S4FND 103, S4FND 104, S4FND 105, S4FND 106, S4FND 107, WEBCUIF 701, WEBCUIF 731, WEBCUIF 746, WEBCUIF 747, WEBCUIF 748, WEBCUIF 800, WEBCUIF 801, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. After successful exploitation, an attacker with user level access can read and modify some sensitive information but cannot delete the data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP CRM WebClient UI due to insufficient encoding of user-controlled inputs. Affected components include SAPSCORE, S4FND (versions 102-107), and WEBCUIF (versions 701, 731, 746-748, 800-801). An authenticated user with standard access can inject malicious scripts that execute in the context of other users' sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.01= 7.31= 7.46= 7.47= 7.48= 8.00= 8.01= 1.02= 102= 103= 104= 105= 106= 107= 129CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SAP product componentCheck which SAP component is installed: execute transaction code SPAM or use transaction SE16N to view table CVERS_COMPONENTS to list installed SAP components. Look for SAPSCORE, S4FND, or WEBCUIF.Affected if The component SAPSCORE, S4FND, or WEBCUIF is installed on the system
-
Check SAPSCORE versionExecute transaction code SM37 or use ABAP report to query system version. Navigate to SAP System -> Status to view SAP Release and SAP Kernel version. Look specifically for SAPSCORE component version.Affected if SAPSCORE version is exactly 129
-
Check S4FND versionExecute transaction code SPAM and check component version for S4FND. Alternatively use SAINT to view installed software components. Look for S4FND version in the range 102-107 or version 1.02.Affected if S4FND version equals 1.02 or is between 102 and 107 inclusive
-
Check WEBCUIF versionExecute transaction code SE16 and query table COMPONENT_INFO or use SPAM to view installed components. Look for WEBCUIF version 701, 731, 746, 747, 748, 800, or 801.Affected if WEBCUIF version is 701, 731, 746, 747, 748, 800, or 801
-
Verify WebClient UI is enabledCheck if WebClient UI framework is active by reviewing transaction SICF (SAP Internet Communication Manager) for WebClient UI services, or check if transaction CRM_UI or similar WebClient UI transactions are accessible to users.Affected if WebClient UI is active and accessible to authenticated users
The system is affected if SAPSCORE version 129, S4FND versions 102-107 or 1.02, or WEBCUIF versions 701/731/746-748/800-801 is installed AND WebClient UI framework is enabled and accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply SAP security patches for the affected versions. Implement proper output encoding for all user-controlled inputs in the WebClient UI framework.
WEBCUIF 748+ or S4FND 105+ or SAPSCORE 130+ (depending on your component)
- 1. Identify the current version of the SAP component (WEBCUIF or S4FND or SAPSCORE) in your system using SAP transaction SM37 or system profile.
- 2. For WEBCUIF (WebClient UI) components: Upgrade to WEBCUIF 748 or higher (800 or 801).
- 3. For S4FND (S/4HANA Foundation) components: Upgrade to S4FND 105 or higher (106 or 107).
- 4. For SAPSCORE components: Upgrade to a version higher than 129 (check SAP notes for the latest patched version).
- 5. After upgrade, verify the system landscape to ensure all dependent components are compatible.
- 6. Test critical business workflows in a non-production environment before deploying the upgrade to production.
- 7. Apply SAP Security Notes (refer to SAP support portal for CVE-2023-29188 specific notes) after the upgrade to ensure complete remediation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29188 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29188 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data