Secure GatewayApplication · Vadesecure

CVE-2023-29714

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-06-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.0 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability found in Vade Secure Gateway allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the username, password, and language cookies parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Vade Secure Gateway allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript code through malicious values in the username, password, and language cookies. When these cookie values are reflected in web pages without proper sanitization, the attacker's script executes in victims' browsers.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and output encoding for all cookie parameters (username, password, language). Additionally, set HttpOnly and Secure flags on sensitive cookies and deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Secure GatewayApplication
Affected:<= 3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Vade Secure Gateway installation and version
    Locate the Vade Secure Gateway installation and identify its version number. Check the application web interface, installation logs, or system package information. Compare the installed version against the affected range: version 3.0 and below.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.0 or lower
  2. Verify web interface is accessible
    Attempt to reach the Vade Secure Gateway login page or web portal over HTTP or HTTPS. This vulnerability requires the web application to be accessible for cookie injection to occur.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible to users or attackers on the network
  3. Inspect cookie attributes for username, password, and language cookies
    Log into the web interface or trigger the relevant authentication flows, then use browser developer tools or a proxy to examine the Set-Cookie headers and stored cookies. Check whether the username, password, and language cookies have the HttpOnly and Secure flags set.
    Affected if These cookies lack the HttpOnly flag, allowing JavaScript access, or lack the Secure flag when HTTPS is used
  4. Review application response headers for Content Security Policy
    Capture HTTP responses from the web application using a browser or HTTP client. Inspect the response headers for the presence of Content-Security-Policy or X-Content-Security-Policy headers.
    Affected if No CSP headers are present, or the policy does not restrict inline script execution

A defender is affected if Vade Secure Gateway version 3.0 or lower is running with its web interface accessible and the affected cookies (username, password, language) are set without HttpOnly/Secure flags or adequate CSP protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.0
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input validation and output encoding for all cookie parameters (username, password, language). Additionally, set HttpOnly and Secure flags on sensitive cookies and deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Fix this in Secure Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29714 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29714 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data