CVE-2023-30441
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Runtime Environment, Java Technology Edition IBMJCEPlus and JSSE 8.0.7.0 through 8.0.7.11 components could expose sensitive information using a combination of flaws and configurations. IBM X-Force ID: 253188.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Runtime Environment Java components IBMJCEPlus (cryptographic provider) and JSSE (SSL/TLS) versions 8.0.7.0 through 8.0.7.11 contain a combination of implementation flaws and insecure configuration options that can lead to exposure of sensitive information, likely cryptographic keys or plaintext data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.7>= 8.0.7.0, < 8.0.7.15>= 8.5.0.0, < 8.5.5.23all versions= 9.0.0.0= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Java versionRun 'java -version' or check the version file in the IBM Java installation directory (e.g., $JAVA_HOME/release or $JAVA_HOME/jre/release). Look for the version string (e.g., 8.0.7.x).Affected if The version is 8.0.7.0 through 8.0.7.11 (or 8.0.7.14 and below for IBM Java, since the fix is in 8.0.7.15+)
-
Determine if IBMJCEPlus cryptographic provider is enabledInspect the Java security properties file (java.security) in the JRE/lib/security directory. Look for a line configuring 'ibmJCEPlus' as a security provider, typically numbered like 'security.provider.N=com.ibm.crypto.ibmJCEPlus.IBMJCEPlusProvider'.Affected if IBMJCEPlus provider is listed and enabled in the security provider configuration
-
Check for IBM JSSE (SSL/TLS) usageReview application server or Java application configuration files for SSL/TLS settings that reference IBM JSSE classes (com.ibm.jsse2.* or com.ibm.net.ssl.*). In WebSphere, check the SSL configuration panel or the security.xml file.Affected if IBM JSSE is configured or used for SSL/TLS connections in the application or application server
-
Identify IBM WebSphere Application Server versionIf using WebSphere, check the version via the installation directory (e.g., aboutWebSphere.html) or the Installation Verification Tool (IVT). For traditional WAS, check the 'product.installroot' or version info file.Affected if WebSphere version is 8.5.0.0 through 8.5.5.22, any version 9.0.x prior to fixes, or bundled with vulnerable IBM Java versions in the 8.0.7.0-8.0.7.11 range
-
Check for IBM InfoSphere Information Server versionVerify if IBM InfoSphere Information Server version 11.7 is installed and check its bundled Java components. Review installation directories for IBM Java runtimes.Affected if InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is deployed with bundled IBM Java in the vulnerable version range
You are affected if your environment uses IBM Java 8.0.7.0-8.0.7.11 (or WebSphere/InfoSphere with bundled vulnerable IBM Java) AND has IBMJCEPlus cryptographic provider or IBM JSSE SSL/TLS enabled for handling sensitive data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.0.7.158.5.5.23
Upgrade IBM Runtime Environment Java to version 8.0.7.12 or later; review and harden IBMJCEPlus and JSSE configurations per IBM security guidance.
IBM Java 8.0.7.15+ or WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.23+/9.0.0.5+
- Identify the affected IBM product in your environment (Java 8.0.7.x, WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x/9.0.x, or Infosphere Information Server 11.7)
- For IBM Java: upgrade to Java 8.0.7.15 or later (8.0.7.15 contains the fix for the IBMJCEPlus and JSSE vulnerabilities)
- For WebSphere Application Server: upgrade to version 8.5.5.23 or later, or migrate to WebSphere 9.0.0.5 or later which contains the fix
- After upgrading, verify that the IBMJCEPlus and JSSE providers are properly configured in the java.security file
- Restart all Java/WebSphere services to load the updated runtime
- Validate that applications function correctly with the updated cryptographic providers
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30441 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30441 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data