CVE-2023-30514
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Azure Key Vault Plugin 187.va_cd5fecd198a_ and earlier does not properly mask (i.e., replace with asterisks) credentials in the build log when push mode for durable task logging is enabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Azure Key Vault Plugin versions 187.va_cd5fecd198a_ and earlier fails to properly mask (replace with asterisks) credentials in build logs when push mode for durable task logging is enabled, resulting in plaintext credential exposure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 187.va_cd5fecd198aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Azure Key Vault Plugin versionNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Azure Key Vault', or use the Jenkins CLI: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar list-plugins | grep -i 'azure key vault'Affected if The installed version is 187.va_cd5fecd198a or earlier (any version <= 187.va_cd5fecd198a)
-
Verify push mode for durable task logging is enabledCheck the Jenkins configuration file (jenkins.model.JenkinsLocationConfiguration.xml) for the property 'org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$DescriptorImpl.pushMode=true', or navigate to: Manage Jenkins > System Configuration > System > scroll to 'Durable Task' settings and check if push mode is enabledAffected if Push mode for durable task logging is enabled in the Jenkins configuration
A user is affected if they have Azure Key Vault Plugin version 187.va_cd5fecd198a or earlier AND have push mode for durable task logging enabled, as both conditions must be true for the credential masking failure to occur.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade the Azure Key Vault Plugin to the latest version. Alternatively, if immediate upgrade is not feasible, disable push mode for durable task logging until the patch can be applied.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30514 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30514 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data