Thycotic Devops Secrets VaultApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2023-30515
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin 1.0.0 and earlier does not properly mask (i.e., replace with asterisks) credentials in the build log when push mode for durable task logging is enabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Jenkins Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin versions 1.0.0 and earlier fails to mask credentials with asterisks in build logs when push mode for durable task logging is enabled, causing sensitive credentials to be exposed in plaintext within build output.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Thycotic Devops Secrets VaultApplication
<= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault' or 'thycotic' to confirm the plugin is present in the environmentAffected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn Jenkins Manage Plugins > Installed tab, locate the Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin and note the version number displayedAffected if The version is 1.0.0 or earlier (e.g., 1.0.0, 0.9.x, or any version <= 1.0.0)
-
Determine if push mode for durable task logging is enabledReview the Jenkins configuration and the Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin configuration for any setting related to 'push mode' or 'durable task logging' and verify whether it is enabledAffected if Push mode for durable task logging is turned on in the plugin or global Jenkins configuration
-
Inspect recent build logs for exposed credentialsExamine build logs from jobs that use the Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin, searching for any plaintext credentials, API keys, tokens, or secrets that should have been masked with asterisksAffected if Plaintext credentials appear in build logs instead of being masked with asterisks or similar placeholder characters
A user is affected if the Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin version is 1.0.0 or earlier AND push mode for durable task logging is enabled AND plaintext credentials are visible in build logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade the Thycotic DevOps Secrets Vault Plugin to a version newer than 1.0.0, or disable push mode for durable task logging if an upgrade is not available.
Fix this in Thycotic Devops Secrets Vault
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30515 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30515 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data