Report PortalApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2023-30526
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA missing permission check in Jenkins Report Portal Plugin 0.5 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified bearer token authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Report Portal Plugin versions 0.5 and earlier lacks proper permission enforcement, allowing any user with basic Overall/Read permission to abuse the plugin's HTTP client functionality. Attackers can specify arbitrary URLs and bearer tokens, potentially exfiltrating sensitive data or pivoting to internal services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Report PortalApplication
<= 0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Report Portal Plugin is installedIn Jenkins, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Report Portal', or run in script console: Jenkins.instance.pluginManager.plugins.any { it.shortName == 'report-portal' }Affected if The plugin appears in the installed list
-
Determine the installed version of Report Portal PluginIn Jenkins plugin manager, view the version column for Report Portal Plugin, or run in script console: Jenkins.instance.pluginManager.plugins.find { it.shortName == 'report-portal' }?.versionAffected if Version returned is 0.5 or lower, or cannot be determined (older plugin format)
-
Verify the plugin is active and loadedIn Jenkins script console, run: Jenkins.instance.pluginManager.plugins.find { it.shortName == 'report-portal' }?.enabled and check that it returns true, or check plugin is not disabled in Manage PluginsAffected if Plugin is enabled (active in Jenkins runtime)
-
Confirm plugin provides HTTP client functionalityCheck the plugin's configuration at Manage Jenkins > Configure System > Report Portal section, or examine if the plugin exposes any pipeline steps or build wrappers related to Report PortalAffected if Plugin has configurable HTTP endpoint settings visible to users with Overall/Read
Your environment is affected if Report Portal Plugin version 0.5 or earlier is installed and enabled, allowing any user with basic Overall/Read permission to configure external HTTP calls through the plugin.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade the Report Portal Plugin to a version that implements proper permission checks (typically requiring Overall/Administer or equivalent elevated permissions) before allowing external HTTP connections.
Fix this in Report Portal
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30526 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30526 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data