Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2023-30587

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-09-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in Node.js version 20 allows for bypassing restrictions set by the --experimental-permission flag using the built-in inspector module (node:inspector). By exploiting the Worker class's ability to create an "internal worker" with the kIsInternal Symbol, attackers can modify the isInternal value when an inspector is attached within the Worker constructor before initializing a new WorkerImpl. This vulnerability exclusively affects Node.js users employing the permission model mechanism. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Node.js v20 contains a vulnerability in the experimental permission model where attackers can bypass --experimental-permission restrictions using the inspector module. The Worker class allows creation of 'internal workers' via the kIsInternal Symbol, and when an inspector is attached within the Worker constructor before WorkerImpl initialization, attackers can manipulate the isInternal flag to circumvent permission checks.

MitigationAvoid using the experimental permission model (--experimental-permission) for security-critical restrictions in production environments until a patch is available; monitor Node.js security advisories for updates.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Node.js version
    Run `node --version` to determine the installed Node.js version
    Affected if The version is 20.x (any minor/patch release of Node.js v20)
  2. Verify experimental permission flag usage
    Inspect your Node.js startup scripts, process arguments, or environment variables (NODE_OPTIONS) for the presence of `--experimental-permission` flag
    Affected if The `--experimental-permission` flag is enabled in your Node.js runtime configuration
  3. Confirm inspector module accessibility
    Review application code and dependencies to determine if the inspector module (or V8 inspector API) is accessible, either directly via `require('inspector')` or indirectly through debugging/profiling endpoints
    Affected if The inspector module can be loaded or debug endpoints are reachable in your environment
  4. Check Worker class usage
    Search codebase for Worker constructor usage (`new Worker(...)`) from the worker_threads module
    Affected if Your application uses the Worker class from worker_threads module alongside experimental permissions

You are affected if you run Node.js v20 with --experimental-permission enabled AND your environment allows access to the inspector module or Worker threads, as the permission model can be bypassed in this configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Avoid using the experimental permission model (--experimental-permission) for security-critical restrictions in production environments until a patch is available; monitor Node.js security advisories for updates.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,920
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,672.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30587 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30587 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data