CVE-2023-30631
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Traffic Server. The configuration option proxy.config.http.push_method_enabled didn't function. However, by default the PUSH method is blocked in the ip_allow configuration file.This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 9.2.0. 8.x users should upgrade to 8.1.7 or later versions 9.x users should upgrade to 9.2.1 or later versions
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Traffic Server contains an improper input validation vulnerability where the configuration option proxy.config.http.push_method_enabled doesn't function as intended. Although the PUSH method is blocked by default in the ip_allow configuration file, the non-functional configuration option creates a scenario where proper method control cannot be enforced, potentially allowing HTTP PUSH method requests to be processed when they should be blocked.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.1.7>= 9.0.0, < 9.2.1= 10.0= 11.0= 12.0= 37= 38CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Traffic Server versionRun 'traffic_server -v' or check package manager (dpkg -l traffic-server, rpm -q traffic-server) to get the installed versionAffected if Version is >= 8.0.0 and < 8.1.7, OR >= 9.0.0 and < 9.2.1
-
Locate traffic layout configurationCheck records.config (typically in /etc/trafficserver/ or /usr/local/etc/trafficserver/) for proxy.config.http.push_method_enabled settingAffected if The push_method_enabled configuration option exists and is set to a value that suggests it should allow method control, but the ip_allow file is the only enforcement mechanism
-
Examine ip_allow configuration for PUSH methodCheck ip_allow.config file in the same directory as records.config for PUSH method entries; default location is /etc/trafficserver/ip_allow.configAffected if PUSH method is explicitly allowed or not properly blocked in ip_allow.config, relying on the non-functional proxy.config.http.push_method_enabled for protection
-
Verify if server accepts PUSH method requestsSend a test HTTP PUSH request to the server (e.g., using curl -X PUSH) and observe the response codeAffected if Server accepts and processes PUSH method requests when it should be blocking them based on ip_allow configuration
A user is affected if Apache Traffic Server version is 8.0.0-8.1.6 or 9.0.0-9.2.0 AND the ip_allow.config relies on the non-functional proxy.config.http.push_method_enabled option to block PUSH method requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.79.2.1
Upgrade Apache Traffic Server to version 8.1.7 or later (for 8.x users) or 9.2.1 or later (for 9.x users) to resolve the non-functional configuration option.
8.1.7 or later for 8.x branches; 9.2.1 or later for 9.x branches
- 1. Identify the currently installed Apache Traffic Server version (e.g., trafficctl config get proxy.config.version.str or trafficctl server)
- 2. Stop the Apache Traffic Server service (e.g., systemctl stop traffic_server or trafficctl stop)
- 3. Upgrade Apache Traffic Server to version 8.1.7 or later for 8.x branches, or 9.2.1 or later for 9.x branches, using your system's package manager (apt, yum, dnf) or by building from source
- 4. Verify the new version is installed correctly (trafficctl config get proxy.config.version.str)
- 5. Start the Apache Traffic Server service (e.g., systemctl start traffic_server or trafficctl start)
- 6. Confirm the PUSH method is properly blocked by checking the ip_allow configuration file and testing the configuration option proxy.config.http.push_method_enabled
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30631 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30631 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data