CVE-2023-30743
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to improper neutralization of input in SAPUI5 - versions SAP_UI 750, SAP_UI 754, SAP_UI 755, SAP_UI 756, SAP_UI 757, UI_700 200, sap.m.FormattedText SAPUI5 control allows injection of untrusted CSS. This blocks user’s interaction with the application. Further, in the absence of URL validation by the application, the vulnerability could lead to the attacker reading or modifying user’s information through phishing attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe sap.m.FormattedText control in SAPUI5 versions 750-757 and UI_700 200 improperly neutralizes CSS input, allowing attackers to inject untrusted CSS. This can disrupt user interaction with the application and enable phishing attacks when applications fail to validate URLs embedded in the control.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 700= 750= 754= 755= 756= 757CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SAPUI5 versionLocate and inspect the sap-ui-version.js file in your SAPUI5 distribution, or check the sap-ui-version info in the bootstrap script tag of your applicationAffected if The version is 700, 750, 754, 755, 756, or 757 exactly as listed in the affected versions
-
Confirm sap.m.FormattedText control usageSearch your application source code for references to sap.m.FormattedText or the XML namespace xmlns:m="sap.m" used in XML views with <FormattedText> elementsAffected if The FormattedText control is present and used in your application
-
Check for unsanitized HTML/CSS inputExamine how the FormattedText control receives data - review any code that sets the htmlText property or binds data to the control, looking for direct insertion of user input without sanitizationAffected if User-supplied or external data is directly passed to the htmlText property without validation or encoding
Your environment is affected if you run SAPUI5 version 700, 750, 754, 755, 756, or 757 and your application uses the sap.m.FormattedText control with unsanitized input in the htmlText property.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate SAPUI5 to a patched version and ensure applications using the FormattedText control implement proper URL validation to prevent phishing vectors.
SAP_UI 757 or latest available SAP_UI version
- 1. Identify your current SAPUI5/SAP_UI version from your project's package.json or manifest.json, or check the SAP_UI version in your SAP system.
- 2. Check the official SAP Note referenced in launchpad.support.sap.com for this CVE (note number typically included in the SAP security advisory for CVE-2023-30743).
- 3. Upgrade your SAP_UI/SAPUI5 dependency to version SAP_UI 757 or higher (the description indicates versions 756 and 757 are also affected, so target the latest stable SAP_UI release beyond 757).
- 4. If using UI_700, upgrade to a newer UI_700 patch level or migrate to a higher SAP_UI version.
- 5. After upgrading, clear browser caches and test the application to verify the FormattedText control works correctly.
- 6. Verify the fix by checking that the CSS injection vulnerability is no longer present in the FormattedText control.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30743 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30743 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data